General Information

| 0 comments

Case Studies- Regional Level Application

Avery, M., D. W. Gibbons, R. Porter, T. Tew, G. Tucker, and G. Williams. 1995. Revising the British Red List for birds: the biological basis of U.K. conservation priorities. Ibis 137:S232–S239.

Bauer, H. G. 2003. Red-listing of birds in Germany. Pages 149–157 in H. H. De Iongh, O. S. Bánki, W. Bergmans, and M. J. van der Werff ten Bosch, editors. The harmonization of red lists for threatened species in Europe. The Netherlands Commission for International
Nature Protection, Leiden.

Bennun, L. A., P. Njoroge, and D. Pomeroy. 2000. Birds to watch: a red data list for East Africa. Ostrich 71:310–314.

Bollmann, K., V. Keller, W. Müller, and N. Zbinden. 2002. Prioritäre Vogelarten für Artenförderungsprogramme in der Schweiz. Der Ornithologische Beobachter 99:301–320.

Broughton, D. A., and J. H. McAdam. 2002. A red data list for the Falkland Islands vascular flora. Oryx 36:279–287.

de Grammont, P. C., and A. D. Cuarón. 2006. An evaluation of threatened species categorization systems used on the American continent. Conservation Biology 20:14–27.

Dunn, E. H., D. J. T. Hussell, and D. A. Welsh. 1999. Priority setting tool applied to Canada’s landbirds based on concern and responsibility for species. Conservation Biology 13:1404–1415.

Eaton, M., R. D. Gregory, D. G. Noble, J. A. Robinson, J. Hughes, D. Procter, A. F. Brown, and D.W. Gibbons. 2005. Regional IUCN red-listing: the process as applied to birds in the United Kingdom. Conservation Biology 19:1557–1570.

Golding, J. S., and P. J. H. Hurter. 2003. A red list account of Africa’s cycads and implications of considering life-history and threats. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:507–528.

Grigera, D., and C. Ubeda. 2002. Una revisión de los trabajos sobre categorizaciones y prioridades de conservación de los vertebrados de Argentina. Ecología Austral 12:163–174.

Greenbaum, E., Komar, O. 2005. Threat assessment and conservation prioritization of the herpetofauna of El Salvador. Biodiversity and Conservation. 14: 2377-2395.

K eller, V., N. Zbinden, H. Schmid, and B. Volet. 2005. A case study in applying the IUCN “Regional Guidelines” for national red lists. Conservation Biology 19:1827–1834.

Köppel, C., F. Jansen, J. Burton, M. Schnittler, and N. Hirneisen. 2003. A statistical survey on European red lists. Pages 59–75 in H. H. De Iongh, O. S. Bánki, W. Bergmans, and M. J. van der Werff ten Bosch, editors. The harmonization of red lists for threatened species in Europe. The Netherlands Commission for International Nature Protection, Leiden.

Maes, D., and C. A. M. van Swaay. 1997. A new methodology for compiling national red lists applied to butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) in Flanders (N-Belgium) and the Netherlands. Journal of Insect Conservation 1:113–124.

Maes, D., L. de Bruyn, and E. Kuijken. 2003. Applying red list criteria in Flanders (North Belgium). Pages 217–223 in H. H. De Iongh, O. S. Bánki, W. Bergmans, and M. J. van der Werff ten Bosch, editors. The harmonization of red lists for threatened species in Europe. The Netherlands Commission for International Nature Protection, Leiden.

Mehlman, D. W., K. V. Rosenberg, J. V. Wells, and B. Robertson. 2004. A comparison of North American avian conservation priority ranking systems. Biological Conservation 120:383–390.

Milner-Gulland, E. J., et al. 2006. Application of IUCN red listing criteria at the regional and national levels: a case study from Central Asia. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:1873–1886.

Molur, S., and S.Walker. 1998. Conservation assessment of the herpetofauna of India—an overview. Hamadryad 23:169–178.

Palmer, M. A., N. G. Hodgetts, M. J. Wigginton, B. Ing, and N. F. Stewart. 1997. The application to the British flora of theWorld Conservation Union’s revised red list criteria and the significance of red lists for species conservation. Biological Conservation 82:219–226.

Patra, M. K., S. K. Acharjee, and S. K. Chakraborty. 2005. Conservation categories of siluroid fishes in North-East Sundarbans, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:1863–1876.

Pinchera, F., L. Boitani, and F. Corsi. 1997. Application to the terrestrial vertebrates of Italy of a system proposed by IUCN for a new classification of national red list categories. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:959–978.

Randrianasolo, A., J. S. Miller, and T. K. Consiglio. 2002. Application of IUCN criteria and Red List categories to species of five Anacardiaceae genera in Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation 11:1289–1300.

Rodríguez, J. P., F. Rojas-Suárez, and C. J. Sharpe. 2004. Setting priorities for the conservation of Venezuela’s threatened birds. Oryx 38:373–382.

Samways, M. J. 2002. Red-listed Odonata of Africa. Odonatologica 31:151–170.

Schnittler, M., and K. F. Günther. 1999. Central European vascular plants requiring priority conservation measures—an analysis from national red lists and distribution maps. Biodiversity and Conservation 8:891–925.

Gärdenfors, U. 2001. Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:511–516.

Gärdenfors, U., Hilton-Taylor, C., Mace, G.M., Rodríguez, R.P. 2001. The Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels. 15 (5): 1206-1212.

Miller, R.M., Rodríguez, J.P., Aniskowicz-Fowler, T., Bambaradeniya, C., Boles, R., Eaton, M.A., Gärdenfors, U., Keller, V., Molur, S., Walker, S., Pollock, C. (2006) Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities. Science. 313: 441.

Miller, R.M., Rodríguez, J.P., Aniskowicz-Fowler, T., Bambaradeniya, C., Boles, R., Eaton, M.A., Gärdenfors, U., Keller, V., Molur, S., Walker, S., Pollock, C. (2007) National Threatened Species Listing Based on IUCN Criteria and Regional Guidelines: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Conservation Biology. 21 (3): 684-696.

Zamin, T.J., Baillie, J.E.M., Miller, R.M., Rodriguez, J., Ardid, A., Collen, B. 2010. National Red Listing beyond the 2010 target. Conservation Biology. (DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01492.x).