Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

EN

Assessment ID
330601
Taxon name
Rallus aquaticus
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rallus aquaticus
Linnaeus, 1758
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
gruiformes
Family
rallidae
Genus
Rallus
Species
aquaticus
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Rallus aquaticus and R. indicus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as R. aquaticus following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. However, there is high potential for immigration, which is unlikely to decrease. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional adjustment down one category and is listed as Endangered at the national level. Whilst the population trend in the UAE is not known, it is a difficult species to survey for.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare to very uncommon in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). The majority of observations of the species within the country are likely to be of migrant individuals and winter visitors from breeding grounds in central Asia, Iran, Kashmir and western China (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017), but it is still irregularly seen. However, between 2007 and 2018, the species has been recorded 13 times in total between August and May in Abu Dhabi (Al Wathba Wetland Reserve, Ruwais, Sila, Al Ain), Dubai (near Dubai City), Ajman (Ajman City, Al Zorah) and Ras al-Khaimah emirates (Ras al-Khaimah Khor) (Pedersen et al. 2017), and there is a small breeding population in the UAE; the first breeding was observed in Ruwais (Abu Dhabi Emirate) in 1995 (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits brackish or freshwater ponds with dense vegetation in the water and on the borders, particularly reed beds, marshes and ditches (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). During migration, it may also occupy mangroves, saline lakes and tidal pools (Jennings 2010). It forages in shallow water, in mud or on land, where it takes items from the water surface or from the ground (Jennings 2010). The species regularly uses well-defined paths between favoured food sources within its habitat (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it is omnivorous, its diet consisting predominantly of animal matter such as worms, leeches, molluscs, shrimps, crayfish, spiders, terrestrial and aquatic insects and larvae, amphibians, fish, birds and mammals (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Taylor 1998). It also takes plant matter including shoots, roots, seeds, berries and fruits (del Hoyo et al. 1996). The species's breeding biology in the UAE and elsewhere in Arabia is poorly known. Based on calling activity on the Saudi Arabian coast of the Arabian Gulf, the breeding period likely starts in February with territory establishment and pair formation; chicks may hatch in April and May and most juveniles are observed in July and August (Jennings 2010). Usually, the nest is a substantial cup of vegetation that is usually positioned in thick stands of reeds or rushes on the ground in or near water, or rarely on a tree stump or in the open (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Taylor 1998).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The key threats to this species within the UAE come from habitat degradation, via land-use changes, infilling, drainage and potentially pollution (see Aspinall 1996).
History
In 1996, the population size was very small, sufficient to qualify for CR (D). As the species had only just become established as a breeding bird, no regional adjustment is made, unlike for the current assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330591
Taxon name
Gymnoris xanthocollis
(Burton, 1838)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Gymnoris xanthocollis
(Burton, 1838)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
passeridae
Genus
Gymnoris
Species
xanthocollis
Species authority
(Burton, 1838)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Gymnoris xanthocollis (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously placed in the genus Petronia following AERC TAC (2003); Cramp and Simmons (1977-1994); Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The population size of this species within the UAE is potentially very small, potentially as low as 100 mature individuals, and the population is suspected to be declining. Therefore, the species is assessed as Endangered, without applying a regional adjustment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species breeds in the northern and eastern UAE, where it is common but localized (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). Occurrences in the southern and western parts of the country as well as in islands during March/April and September/October are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in open dry woodland, but sometimes also in cultivated areas with scattered trees or hedgerows, generally avoiding sandy desert (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Summers-Smith 2019). It has a strong preference for Ghaf (Prosopis cineraria) and acacia trees; however, during passage, almost any type of woodland is utilised, including mangroves, parks and large gardens (Jennings 2010). During the breeding season, the diet mainly consists of insects, in particular Orthoptera and Cicadidae, which are collected in the canopy of trees (Jennings 2010). Individuals on passage take nectar from flowering Eucalyptus and probably also Ghaf trees (Jennings 2010). Individuals arrive to the breeding grounds within the UAE from late March to April, when territories are established and males start singing. The breeding period is not known exactly, but it is assumed that three to four eggs are laid in April/May, which are incubated by the female, and juveniles fledge between mid-May and early July (Jennings 2010). Nests have not been described for the UAE. Elsewhere, they consist of; dry grass, wool and hair, lined with feathers. They are usually placed in a crevice in a tree or shrub in more than 2 m height. There might be competition for nest sites with other hole-breeders, including Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) and Pallid Scops-owl (Otus brucei) (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Loss of woodland (e.g. Acacia and Prosopis), would have an impact on this species (see Aspinall 1996). Development in certain areas would also likely pose a threat to this species. There is some trade in this species, but this is only thought to involve imported individuals rather than capture from the wild within the country (Aspinall 1996).
History
This species breeding in Ghaf groves, which have declined since 1996 and it is possible that the species doesn't adapt to altered habitats; which means that this species is suspected to be undergoing a decline within the UAE. While the 1996 population estimate of Aspinall (1996) is considered to be an overestimate, it is still considered here that the species would have warranted a listing of Least Concern in 1996, whereas now it is assessed as Endangered.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330577
Taxon name
Hypocolius ampelinus
Bonaparte, 1850
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hypocolius ampelinus
Bonaparte, 1850
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
hypocoliidae
Genus
Hypocolius
Species
ampelinus
Species authority
Bonaparte, 1850
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The non-breeding, over-wintering population size of this species within the UAE is very small. In the absence of any evidence for a decline in the population, it is listed as Endangered under Criterion D, and has not been given a regional adjustment given uncertainties over conditions within its global range.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are of individuals stopping over during migration to and from the breeding grounds, with highest numbers during late winter and early spring. Some individuals winter in the country between November and mid-April (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species was first recorded in the UAE on Das Island in April 1987 (L. Reaney per Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The occurrence of the species within the UAE peaks in early spring, when individuals stop over during passage, while some individuals stay for the non-breeding season between November and April (Pedersen et al. 2017). There is no information available on this species within the country. The following information refer to its general habitat and ecology and likely also apply to the population in the UAE: During passage and on the wintering grounds, the species occupies tamarisk and acacia woodland, scrubs and palm groves (Aspinall and Porter 2011, Porter et al. 2019). The presence of fruiting trees, e.g. date palms and Salvadora persica trees, and drinking water is essential for the species (Porter et al. 2019). It mainly feeds on Salvadora persica berries and locally on dates, but during winter also takes flying invertebrates (Porter et al. 2019).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
This species is likely to be threatened by the loss of its key forest habitat, potentially due to logging, clearance for development, or from overgrazing (del Hoyo et al. 2005). Drainage schemes within its range are at least not thought to have been beneficial for the species (del Hoyo et al. 2005). Conflicts within its range are another potential cause of habitat loss and disturbance.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330564
Taxon name
Ardenna grisea
(Gmelin, 1789)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Ardenna grisea
(Gmelin, 1789)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
procellariiformes
Family
procellariidae
Genus
Ardenna
Species
grisea
Species authority
(Gmelin, 1789)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Ardenna grisea;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014);was previously placed in the genus Puffinus as P. griseus.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
On the global scale, the species is classified as Near Threatened because it is thought to have undergone a moderately rapid decline owing to the impact of fisheries, the harvesting of its young and possibly climate change. This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which would qualify it for listing as Critically Endangered. However, given that the UAE is marginal in the wintering distribution range, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has been adjusted down one category and is thus listed as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly considered vagrant, this species it is now realised that it occurs regularly in spring off the east coast (Pedersen et al. 2017). It is mostly found off Khor Kalba (Sharjah Emirate), Fujairah Port, Ras Dibba and Al Badiyah (Fujairah Emirate) (Pedersen et al. 2017). There is only one record from the Arabian Gulf near the Umm Shaif oil field (Pedersen et al. 2017). Birds wintering in the UAE breed on islands off New Zealand or Australia.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is marine (Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it feeds on fish, crustacea and cephalopods, which are caught while diving. The species migrates to the northern hemisphere during the austral winter (Shaffer et al. 2006, Hedd et al. 2012).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the species is potentially impacted by oil and other marine pollution such as plastics, but the severity of these threats are essentially unknown.Across its global range, a suite of other threats have been identified, which could have an impact on individuals that visit UAE:The species is at risk from incidental capture in longline, trawl and gill-net fisheries and suffers the additional effects of depletion of prey stocks (Uhlmann 2003). The species is also subject to direct persecution, and harvesting of young birds ('muttonbirding') currently accounts for the take of around a quarter of a million birds annually (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Heather and Robertson 1997, Newman et al. 2008, 2009), but is unlikely to account for the scale of the observed decline. Investigation into the biological impact of climatic trends led to predictions of large-scale shifts in foraging distribution during the boreal summer and/or dramatic reductions in abundance and survival rate (Ainley et al. 1995, Veit et al. 1996, 1997, Spear and Ainley 1999, Wahl and Tweit 2000, Oedekoven et al. 2001, Hyrenbach and Veit 2003), and indeed it has now been noted that climate change is affecting the foraging distribution of this species at least along the Californian coast (Veit et al. 1997). Declines at monitored breeding sites appear to be linked to changed patterns in large scale oceanic cycles which reduce prey availability (Clucas 2011). Both Brown Rat Rattus norvegicus and House Rat R. rattus are present within the species breeding range, and although egg and chick predation by rats has been demonstrated, the extent of impact is unknown (Jones et al. 2008).
History
It is considered that this species would have had a similar-sized population in 1996, and would have had the same Red List status.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330563
Taxon name
Ardenna carneipes
(Gould, 1844)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Ardenna carneipes
(Gould, 1844)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
procellariiformes
Family
procellariidae
Genus
Ardenna
Species
carneipes
Species authority
(Gould, 1844)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Ardenna carneipes;(del Hoyo et al. 2014);was previously placed in the genus Puffinus.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
On the global scale, the species is classified as Near Threatened because it is thought to have undergone a moderately rapid decline owing to the impact of fisheries.;This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which would qualify it for listing as Critically Endangered. However, given that the UAE is marginal;in the wintering distribution range,;the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has been adjusted down one category and is thus listed as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly considered vagrant, this species is now recognised to occur regularly between May and August off the east coast (Pedersen et al. 2017). It is mostly found off Khor Kalba (Sharjah Emirate) and Fujairah City (Pedersen et al. 2017). Birds occurring off the UAE coast breed on islands off Australia (Carboneras et al. 2019).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is marine. It mainly occurs over continental shelves and slopes, and occasionally in inshore waters. There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, generally it feeds mostly on fish and squid, but also on marine invertebrates, which it takes by pursuit-plunging (Carboneras et al. 2019).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, there is a risk of oil and other marine (plastic) pollution, but the severity of this on individuals that visit the country is essentially unknown. The species does also face a large variety of threats highlighted as potentially having an impact on the overall global population, but the proportion of the individuals that visit the UAE that are affected by these are not certain. These threats include bycatch in fisheries, with the species particularly severely impacted by this (see Tuck et al. 2003, Baker and Wise 2005; Richard and Abraham 2013, 2014). Additionally, the species is globally affected by the ingestion of plastic pollution (see Robertson et al. 2004, Bond and Lavers 2011, Lavers et al. 2014, Lavers and Bond 2016, Lewis 2016), predation by invasive mammals (e.g. Brown Rat Rattus norvegicus, House Rat R. rattus, Red Fox Vulpes vulpes; Gaze 2000, Taylor 2000, Pridell et al. 2006) (as well as competition with rabbits for burrows; Lavers 2015), collisions with traffic (Hutton 2003, DECC 2008), and development of breeding areas (Priddel et al. 2006).
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330562
Taxon name
Bulweria fallax
Jouanin, 1955
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Bulweria fallax
Jouanin, 1955
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
procellariiformes
Family
procellariidae
Genus
Bulweria
Species
fallax
Species authority
Jouanin, 1955
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The UAE is situated on the edge of the species range, and occurrence and numbers may be somewhat variable as a result. Nevertheless, counts of this species on pelagic bird trips suggest that the non-breeding visiting population of this species may be very small (100-600 mature individuals). This qualifies the species for listing as Endangered under criterion D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Bulweria fallax is a poorly known species of the northwest Indian Ocean, occurring widely offshore in the Arabian Sea and Gulfs of Aden and Oman, where it is often the commonest pelagic seabird (Porter et al. 1996). It occurs commonly east of 58'°E in the Arabian Sea as far as the Maldive Ridge, regularly east to southern India and Sri Lanka, and regularly, albeit at low densities, to the eastern Indian Ocean in the Bay of Bengal and off north-western Australia (Van den Berg et al. 1991, Ryan et al. 2013, Lavers et al. 2014). During the summer monsoon (May-September) it congregates off the Socotra archipelago (Yemen), where a breeding colony of at least c.50 pairs was discovered (Taleb 2002) and where c.3,000 pairs are now estimated to nest locally on mainland cliffs (Al Saghier et al. unpublished), and also off the Hallaniyat Islands (southern Oman), where it may nest (or on the Arabian mainland adjacent) (Gallagher 1985).;Similar sea-cliffs within its range on the coast of Somalia deserve investigation for breeding colonies (PERSGA/GEF 2003). A population of unidentified Bulweria petrels, most likely B. fallax, was discovered around Comoro archipelago (Shirihai et al. 2015), with most birds being in active moult, but not all. These individuals, however, show plumage characteristics that do not match with B. fallax.In recent years, work in UAE waters off the Gulf of Oman has revealed erratic influxes of up to 600 birds in Sept -“ Dec (see Campbell;et al.;2017); the species is either very rare or absent for much of the rest of the year.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
It frequents open sea all-year-round, only approaching land during the breeding season, at dusk and after dark (Taleb 2002, PERSGA/GEF 2003). Its foraging areas are poorly known, but presumably related to highly productive areas of oceanic upwelling (PERSGA/GEF 2003). It flies low, taking food from the surface of sea, probably mainly plankton e.g. fish eggs, ctenophores and polychaete worms (PERSGA/GEF 2003).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Seabirds, including this species, were formerly exploited for food and medicinal use (at a subsistence level [Al-Saghier et al. 2000]) on the Halaaniyaat islands (Gallagher 1985) and Socotra (Al-Saghier et al. 2000, Porter et al. in prep.), but this practice appears to be discontinued due to the availability of cheap poultry and the danger of climbing the cliffs (Taleb 2002). Non-native predators (e.g. rats Rattus spp. and Feral Cats Felis catus) are probably a limiting factor on the species' breeding population size (Al-Saghier et al. 2000), although their impact on the Socotran subpopulation may have stabilised long ago, given the long period (over 2,000 years) of coexistence. Mortality and ecosystem degradation resulting from marine oil spills are potential threats.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330558
Taxon name
Nycticorax nycticorax
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Nycticorax nycticorax
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
pelecaniformes
Family
ardeidae
Genus
Nycticorax
Species
nycticorax
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a tiny breeding and non-breeding population, both of which are thought to be increasing within the UAE. The breeding population size is low enough that it would trigger listing as Critically Endangered under Criterion D, while the non-breeding population size would trigger a listing as Endangered. Based on the regional criteria, however, the breeding population warrants a regional adjustment due to the likelihood of a rescue effect. The non-breeding population is precautionarily not thought to warrant such a change. The breeding status takes precedence and so the species is listed as Endangered under Criterion D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest in autumn, when it is fairly common at freshwater sites throughout the country (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Some individuals stay in the country over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017). Breeding has been recorded near Dubai City in 1992, 2013 and 2015, but it has been suggested that the species breeds annually (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits inland wetlands including rivers, freshwater and brackish lakes, densely vegetated marshes, reservoirs, irrigation ponds and sewage treatment plants (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). During migration, it may also be found in wadis (Richardson 1990). Its diet in the UAE is not well known; elsewhere it is an opportunistic feeder taking fish, frogs, tadpoles, turtles, snakes, lizards, insects, spiders, crustaceans, molluscs, leeches, small rodents, bats and the eggs and chicks of other bird species (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The species is largely crepuscular and nocturnal, but may feed diurnally, especially during the breeding season (del Hoyo et al. 1992). It breeds during mid to late summer; nesting sites may be used in consecutive years (Jennings 2010). There is not much known about its breeding biology in the UAE or in Arabia. Usually, the nest is platform constructed of sticks and vegetation placed 2-50 m above water or on dry ground near water in trees, bushes, reedbeds, on cliff ledges and on the ground in protected sites (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Snow and Perrins 1998, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The species nests close together in single- and mixed-species colonies (del Hoyo et al. 1992).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Individuals of this species that visit UAE are also potentially threatened by a range of threats that operate outside of the country. The species is threatened by wetland drainage and destruction (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005) and by droughts in wintering areas (Hafner and Kushlan 2002). It is highly susceptible to pesticides (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kwon et al. 2004, Kushlan and Hancock 2005) such as organophosphates, carbamates (Kwon et al. 2004) and DDE (a breakdown product of DDT), which negatively affect hatching success (Kushlan and Hancock 2005). There are also cases of genetic damage to chicks as a result of petroleum contamination (Custer 2000). The species is susceptible to avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006) and Newcastle disease so may be threatened by future outbreaks (Kuiken et al. 2006). It is also persecuted (anti-predation killing) at aquaculture facilities due to its depredation on fish stocks (Kushlan and Hancock 2005), and has suffered declines due to the exploitation of chicks from nesting colonies in the past (del Hoyo et al. 1992).
History
The species first bred in the UAE in 1992. The species would have qualified as CR (D) under its breeding population, but without rescue effect since it was just becoming established. Its successful colonisation of the country is likely related to increases in suitable artificial habitats.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330552
Taxon name
Phaethon aethereus
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Phaethon aethereus
Linnaeus, 1758
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
phaethontiformes
Family
phaethontidae
Genus
Phaethon
Species
aethereus
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered under criterion D.The breeding population in Saudi Arabia seems to be in decline, although there is still high potential for immigration from stable breeding populations throughout the Arabian Peninsula (Symes et al. 2015). The species has been retained as Endangered at the national level on a precautionary basis pending confirmation of the status of the breeding population.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species ranges across the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It rarely visits mainland shores, but breeds on offshore islands in the Arabian Gulf; Qarnyan, Zirku and Arzanah islands (Javed et al. 2008, Pedersen et al. 2017), and nesting is possible on Sir Bu Nair, but this requires confirmation. There is no nesting at present on Sir Bu Nair, although it did occur there in the past. There has been no breeding on Qarnayn in the last two years (2018-2019); however, it has not been possible to visit Zirku and Arzanah islands, and so nesting birds may have moved to these two islands. It is a rare visitor off the east coast, where it was recorded once;near Khor Kalba (Sharjah Emirate) in October 2017 (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is almost entirely pelagic and only comes ashore to breed. It forages solitarily (Jennings. 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it feeds primarily on small fish, especially flying fish, but will also take squid. Most prey is caught by plunge-diving, but flying-fish are sometimes taken in flight (del Hoyo et al. 1992). It breeds colonially on rocky cliffs or slopes on islands, and only very rarely on the mainland (Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no nest produced from any materials; instead, one egg is laid directly on the bare sand, stone or rock. In Arabia, the species generally nests in long, natural rock cavities with only one entrance, in caves or under overhangs in areas which are free of vegetation (Jennings 2010). The species's breeding biology in the Arabian Gulf is not well known. Birds return to their breeding sites in October and November, with eggs being recorded between December and June. It has been suggested that late breeding records come from inexperienced, young breeders using low-quality nesting sites (Jennings 2010). Breeding colonies are abandoned after breeding when individuals disperse over large distances; radio-tracking revealed that bird breeding on Qarnyan Island travelled to the Kerala coast of India (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The most pressing threats to this species in UAE are the presence of rats and cats on breeding islands, which cause rapid population declines (see Aspinall 1996). Birds of prey can also have an impact (Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016). The presence of oil companies on Zirku and Arzanah has also led to local declines (Aspinall 1996).
History
Even though islands were in a better condition in 1996, it is thought that the population size would have been similar in 1996. Therefore, it would have received the same Red List status then as it does now.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330544
Taxon name
Clanga clanga
(Pallas, 1811)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Clanga clanga
(Pallas, 1811)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Clanga
Species
clanga
Species authority
(Pallas, 1811)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Clanga clanga;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014);was previously placed in the genus Aquila.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The population is increasing within the UAE. However, on a global scale, the species is listed as Vulnerable, as its small population is in rapid decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Given the global situation, a regional adjustment has not been made and the species is retained as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs in the UAE from late September to late April (Pedersen et al. 2017). Part of the population winters along the coast, while another part only passes through the country during migration to and from the breeding grounds, when it also occurs further inland (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found near coastal wetlands during winter, e.g. in mangroves, on inshore islands, in lagoons and mudflats (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011), it may also occur in agricultural areas (e.g. fodder fields and plantations). On passage, the species also occurs in wetlands further inland, such as marshes, but also near rubbish dumps (Richardson 1990). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it feeds on unretrieved quarry, small mammals, waterbirds, frogs and snakes, hunting over swamps, wet meadows and over agricultural land(A. Làµhmus in litt. 1999); birds soar to c.100 m high when hunting. It is a migratory species. Birds breeding in central Asia winter in the UAE or migrate further south along the Arabian Peninsula until north-east Africa (del Hoyo et al. 1994). The species arrives at the non-breeding grounds in September and leaves again between February and April (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species migrates on a broad front, tending to pass in singles, twos and threes with the occasional larger group (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Individuals do not concentrate at bottleneck sites to the extent of many other raptors, such as Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina (del Hoyo et al. 1994).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE artificial habitats that favour this species within the UAE may be transient, so monitoring of such habitats will be important. However, as a migratory species, the key threats to Greater Spotted Eagle appear to come from outside of the UAE, and so threats from outside of the country need to be taken into account.;There is strong evidence of hybridisation between this species and Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina (Bergmanis et al. 1997, Lohmus and Vali 2001, Dombrovski 2002, Vali et al. 2010). In some European countries mixed pairs can constitute 50% of Greater Spotted Eagle pairs (Maciorowski and Mizera 2010) or even more (Vali 2011). It is unclear whether this represents a new phenomenon or a conservation concern, but C. pomarina is far more numerous than C. clanga in the zone of overlap, and the range of C. pomarina appears to be spreading east, further into the range of C. clanga. Other key threats are habitat destruction and disturbance, also poaching and electrocution can be considered important. Suitable habitat mosaics have been lost as a result of afforestation and wetland drainage. In eastern Europe, agricultural intensification and the abandonment of traditional floodplain management have reduced habitat quality (A. Làµhmus in litt. 1999).;Birds are intolerant of permanent human presence in their territories. Forestry operations are a major cause of disturbance. Shooting, deliberate and accidental poisoning are a threat to this species in several areas across its global range, including Russia, the Mediterranean, South-East Asia and Africa (per;P. D. Round in litt. 1998, P. Mirski in litt. 2012). In Israel, poisoning and electrocution are major causes for casualties of wintering population (Perlman and Granit 2012).
History
This species has increased its population size since 1996 due to increasing availability of suitable irrigated habitat, and it is suspected that the population size may have been sufficiently small in 1996 that it would have warranted a listing as Critically Endangered under criterion D then, whereas now (2019) it is assessed as Endangered.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330542
Taxon name
Circus macrourus
(Gmelin, 1770)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Circus macrourus
(Gmelin, 1770)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Circus
Species
macrourus
Species authority
(Gmelin, 1770)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Near Threatened due to a moderately rapid population decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. The population trend within the country is not known. Given the global situation, the species is retained as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout the UAE during passage to and from the breeding grounds. A small population overwinters in the country, when it may occur over large parts of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in open habitat, favouring steppe, grassland, agricultural fields and sandy desert (Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species is migratory, with most birds wintering in sub-Saharan Africa or south-east Asia. Birds occur in the UAE between September and March, occasionally until April, and mainly breed in the steppes of southern Russia (Richardson 1990). Birds migrate on a broad front, with only minor concentrations at bottleneck sites (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Although birds are most often seen singly, females and juveniles can form parties of 10-15 individuals on migration (Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Birds fly at c.1-9 m above the ground when hunting (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Snow and Perrins 1998) and fly generally higher on migration, but tend to remain from c.1-15 m above the ground (Brown et al. 1982).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
As a migratory species, the population of Pallid Harrier that visits UAE may be impacted by threats within the country and outside of it. Within its breeding range, the species is primarily threatened by the destruction and degradation of steppe grasslands through conversion to arable land, burning of vegetation, intensive grazing of wet pastures and the clearance of shrubs and tall weeds (Galushin et al. 2003, E. Bragin in litt. 2007). Fires are started by farmers, arsonists and dry thunderstorms(E. Bragin in litt. 2007). Outside of its breeding grounds, the species is thought to be negatively affected by the loss of grassland due to burning, cutting and overgrazing (Galushin;et al.;2003) and by the intensification of agriculture (R. Simmons in litt. 1999, Galushin et al. 2003), although this requires further research; and the latter is not deemed to be a particular threat within the UAE.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates