Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

EN

Assessment ID
330481
Taxon name
Tyto alba
(Scopoli, 1769)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Tyto alba
(Scopoli, 1769)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
strigiformes
Family
tytonidae
Genus
Tyto
Species
alba
Species authority
(Scopoli, 1769)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small resident population within the UAE. The current population trend is unknown, although it is thought have undergone a population increase (at least up to the 1990's), and this increase could be continuing. Based on its small population size, this species is listed here as Endangered under criterion D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is an uncommon to rare resident in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). It occurs mainly in the area of Abu Dhabi City and Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate) and in the northern emirates (Jennings 2010). Individuals have also been observed on Das Island (Richardson and Aspinall 1998, Jennings 2010). One dead individual was recovered in a separate area of coastal Abu Dhabi Emirate, but it is unsure whether this represents just a vagrant or dispersing individual, so this locality is not included in the map.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in a great variety of habitats. It favours proximity to human settlements, like the vicinity and outskirts of villages near cropland and refuse dumps, but also centres of large towns with sufficient open space for hunting (Jennings 2010). Its natural habitats include open country with scattered trees, forest edges, semi-desert and desert far away from human sites (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It hunts during the night. Its diet includes rodents (e.g., mice, rats or shrews) and birds (e.g., White-cheeked Bulbul Pycnonotus leucogenys, Common Myna Acridotheres tristis, House Sparrow Passer domesticus and domestic Rock Dove Columba livia), but it seems to avoid taking reptiles (Cunningham and Aspinall 2001, Jennings 2010). It breeds between December and June (Jennings 2010). It nests in tree holes, caves, crevices in rocks and abandoned buildings, or nest boxes (Jennings 2010). No nesting material is used, instead the eggs are placed directly in a small cup formed of the droppings, remains of prey and debris that accumulated in the nesting cavity (Jennings 2010). The clutch size is usually three to six eggs, but may be increased with increasing food availability (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within UAE, Aspinall (1996) highlighted the main potential threats to this species as the loss of nesting sites (either due to tree felling or the demolition of ruins), collisions with vehicles, and persecution as the bird may be considered an ill-omen.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330478
Taxon name
Merops persicus
Pallas, 1773
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Merops persicus
Pallas, 1773
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
coraciiformes
Family
meropidae
Genus
Merops
Species
persicus
Species authority
Pallas, 1773
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Critically Endangered. However, the population is stable within the country and in the wider Arabian Peninsula; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has been adjusted down one category and is thus listed as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds. A small population is breeding in the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in almost any kind of habitat during migration. It is most often found in dry, open country with scattered trees (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species passes through the UAE in March to May on the way northward to the breeding grounds, and again in September when it travels southward to the wintering grounds in Africa. It forms small flocks of ten to twenty individuals during migration (Jennings 2010). The breeding sites in Ras al-Khaimah were located in arid environment near the coast, on cultivated land with good access of water to guarantee high food availability (Jennings 2010).The species feeds entirely on winged insects (cicadas, dragonflies, grasshoppers, mantises, butterflies, flying ants, bees, wasps, bugs and beetles), which are chased and caught during flight (Jennings 2010). It nests in loose colonies (Fry and Kirwan 2012), often in close association with the European Bee-eater Merops apiaster, which also used to breed in Ras al-Khaimah (Jennings 2010). After arrival on the breeding site in late March/early April, new nests holes are excavated or old ones restored, before eggs are laid from the end of April. Juveniles hatch in May and fledge in June/July (Jennings 2010). Nest holes are preferably dug at a low angle in flat, sandy ground with scattered bushes or in vertical walls, like wells and banks (Jennings 2010). The nest is a tunnel up to three metres long ending in an enlarged chamber (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). There is no information available on the clutch size in the UAE, but elsewhere clutches contain four to eight eggs (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The species can suffer from human disturbance, particularly in colonies near human habitation (e.g. BirdLife International 2015). As for other bee-eater species within the UAE, the greatest threats to the species within UAE are likely to be development on wilderness land, and the potential for reductions in insect populations (Aspinall 1996, Fry and Boesman 2014, BirdLife International 2015). The potential for declines in invertebrate populations as a result of agricultural intensification and future declines in water availability requires further research.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330477
Taxon name
Todiramphus chloris
(Boddaert, 1783)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Todiramphus chloris
(Boddaert, 1783)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
coraciiformes
Family
alcedinidae
Genus
Todiramphus
Species
chloris
Species authority
(Boddaert, 1783)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small resident population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The population is stable within the country. While it does occur in a tiny area, there is no strong evidence for declines, so it would not qualify for listing as threatened under criterion B, although it would be Vulnerable under criterion D2. As the population in the UAE is geographically isolated from any other breeding population, immigration from outside of the country is highly unlikely. Therefore, the species is retained as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs on the east coast of the UAE. It is present only in a small area of mangroves near Khor Kalba (Sharjah Emirate), where it was discovered in 1962 (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species exclusively inhabits mature forest of coastal mangrove (Black Mangrove Avicennia marina) and associated tidal creeks (Jennings 2010). It feeds on crabs and occasionally on small fish, which it takes by pouncing to the surface from a mangrove perch (Jennings 2010). Its breeding behaviour is not well studied. Pairs have been observed between February and June. Breeding likely takes place in early summer, but nestlings and fledglings have been recorded between January and July. Clutches contain three eggs (Jennings 2010). The species breeds in holes in old mangrove trees, about 1-3 m above high tide level. The nesting cavity has an entrance about 6-10 cm wide and reaches about 40-50 cm into the tree (Jennings 2010). The nest is horizontal and unlined (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) lists a range of potential threats to this species in UAE. The species is potentially incidentally caught in fishing nets (Aspinall 1996). Threats to the species's environment are also important, with loss of its mangrove habitat due to disease, pollution and clearance (e.g. for land reclamation) being particularly threatening, as well as the species being impacted by other human activities, e.g. recreation leading to species disturbance and capture for trade (see Aspinall 1996).
History
While it is plausible that the quality of habitat in the species's tiny range may have been in decline in 1996, with the main threat being considered to be disturbance due to recreational fishing, the number of locations is thought to be >10 despite it only being found in a very small area. Therefore, it is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment, qualifying as Near Threatened under criterion B, Vulnerable under criterion D2, and Endangered under criterion D at both time points.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330472
Taxon name
Aythya ferina
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Aythya ferina
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Aythya
Species
ferina
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted non-breeding population in the UAE. Given that the species is in decline globally and thus the conditions outside of the UAE are deteriorating, the rescue effect is unlikely to be large. The species is therefore listed as Endangered at national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a fairly common but localised winter visitor to the UAE, which stays between October and February or April, occasionally until June, mostly in the north of the country (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds occasionally visit the country and some individuals have stayed over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in well-vegetated wetlands, like freshwater ponds, marshes and reservoirs (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, it is omnivorous, its diet consisting of seeds, roots, rhizomes, the vegetative parts of grasses, sedges and aquatic plants as well as aquatic insects and larvae, molluscs, crustaceans, worms, amphibians and small fish;(Johnsgard 1978,;Brown;et al.;1982,;del Hoyo;et al.;1992,;Marsden and Bellamy 2000,;Kear 2005). Individuals wintering in the UAE mainly breed in central Asia.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Globally, however, the species faces a very wide range of threats, which could impact upon individuals that visit UAE:It is thought that the primary factors that have led to the global decline in this species are most likely to be a combination of: (i) loss of breeding habitat in eastern Europe, and (ii) changes in water chemistry (especially from hyper-eutrophication caused by agricultural runoff). The loss of habitat is thought to primarily result from changes in land management; either the abandonment or intensification of management of lowland marshes and fish ponds (Fox et al. 2016). The abandonment of traditional lowland grazing marshes results in succession to scrub and other unsuitable habitats, whilst greater agricultural intensification leads to marshes being drained. Negative changes to fish pond management also arise from either a reduction in fish production or an intensification that leads to greater use of fish food and medication treatments, and an increase in nutrient inputs. (Fox et al. 2016).Increased predation levels may be partly related to declines in Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus colonies, with which Pochard often associate for the benefits of predator deterrence (Fox et al. 2016). Invasive carp may also provide competition for resources with this species (see Fox et al. 2016).The species may also be threatened by disturbance from hunting (del Hoyo;et al.;1992, Evans and Day 2002, Kear 2005), water-based recreation (Fox;et al.;1994, Kear 2005) and from machinery noise from urban development (Marsden 2000), as well as by habitat destruction (del Hoyo;et al.;1992) on its wintering grounds due to eutrophication (partially as a result of nutrient run-off from agricultural land) (Kear 2005, L. Raudonikis;in litt. 2015). Adults are poisoned by ingesting lead shot (Mateo et al. 1998) and drowned in freshwater fishing nets with mesh sizes greater than 5 cm (Quan et al. 2002). The species is also susceptible to avian influenza, so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the disease (Melville and Shortridge 2006). It is also hunted in numerous countries across its range (e.g. Mateo;et al. 1998, Evans and Day 2002, Balmaki and Barati 2006, Sorrenti;et al.;2006, H. Ibrahim in litt. 2016).
History
The population in the UAE is thought to have been similar to 2019, qualifying as Endangered.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330470
Taxon name
Anas acuta
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Anas acuta
Linnaeus, 1758
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Anas
Species
acuta
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The population;within the country;is uncertain, however, recent data suggest that there may be a decline. In addition, there is a decline at the global level (although still considered;Least Concern).;The species is precautionarily retained as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species commonly occurs throughout the UAE during winter or on passage to and from its sub-Arctic breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Occasionally individuals remain in the country over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs along sheltered coasts, at estuaries and tidal lagoons, as well as at fresh and brackish shallow ponds further inland and at water treatment plants (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, this species is omnivorous and opportunistic, its diet consisting of algae, seeds, tubers, and the vegetative parts of aquatic plants, sedges and grasses, as well as aquatic invertebrates, amphibians and small fish (Johnsgard 1978, Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Hockey et al. 2005). The species is migratory. Individuals wintering in the UAE breed in solitary pairs or loose groups between April and June in sub-Arctic regions (Madge and Burn 1988, Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1992). The species is highly gregarious in winter and on passage, often forming enormous concentrations (Madge and Burn 1988, Scott and Rose 1996). It feeds nocturnally; flocks roost by day on open water (Brown et al. 1982, Hockey et al. 2005). The species is shy and rarely remains at the same site over the winter (Richardson 1990).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown. Wetland habitat loss, petroleum pollution and reclamation of coastal areas for industrial development also pose a threat to this species in other parts of its range (Scott and Rose 1996, BirdLife International 2015).Additionally, individuals of this species that visit UAE are threatened by a range of other threats that operate outside of the country. For instance, the species is threatened by wetland drainage, peat-extraction, changing wetland management practices (decreased grazing and mowing in meadows leading to scrub over-growth) and the burning and mowing of reeds in Russia (Grishanov 2006). Over-exploitation is a concern in large parts of its global range (Baldassarre and Bolen 1994, Kear 2005, Balmaki and Barati 2006, Schmidt 2006).;Pintails are predated by feral cats Felis catus and rats Rattus norvegicus on islands (del Hoyo et al. 1992), and the species is susceptible to avian botulism (Rocke 2006) and avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006, Gaidet et al. 2007) so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases.
History
In 1996, the species was recorded in reasonable numbers at some localities, with a lower recording effort. It is likely to also qualify as Endangered, reduced by one category to Vulnerable (D1) based on potential rescue from the global population, which assumed to have been in better status at that time.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330466
Taxon name
Alectoris chukar
(Gray, 1830)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Alectoris chukar
(Gray, 1830)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
galliformes
Family
phasianidae
Genus
Alectoris
Species
chukar
Species authority
(Gray, 1830)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Due to a presence of a large number of released birds both the population size and trend are uncertain, although it is suspected that the naturally wild population of this species in UAE is fewer than 250 mature individuals. It is therefore listed here as Endangered under criterion D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is native to the northern Hajar Mountains (Fujairah and Ras al-Khaimah emirates) north of Dibba and Masafi, where it is an uncommon resident (Pedersen et al. 2017). It was first recorded in the UAE in Fujairah in April 1987 (Pedersen et al. 2017). Birds outside of the Hajar Mountains are of feral origin and likely not self-sustaining: In 2012, 500 birds were released near Al Ain on Jebel Hafeet (Abu Dhabi Emirate); further releases took place on Jebel Buhays and Qarn Nizwa (Sharjah Emirate) as well as on several islands in the Arabian Gulf (Das, Sir Bani Yas, Marawa, Abu al-Abyad) (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs on arid and semi-arid rocky slopes and hillsides with low vegetation cover and occasional stunted trees and bushes (Watson 1962, Papaevangelou 1980, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is found mainly between 500 and 1,500 m, but ranges down to 200 m during foraging trips, when it also occurs on agricultural land (Pantelis 1980, Papaevangelou 1980, Serez 1992, Khan et al. 2009, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is little known about the diet of the species in the UAE, but individuals in Musandam (Oman) have been observed feeding on berries (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere in the Middle East, the species also takes seeds of grasses and weeds, leaves and insects (Jennings 2010). Availability of water influences population density, even though birds will move up to 10 km to access water (Watson 1962), and likely limits a range expansion in eastern Arabia (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on the breeding behaviour of the species in the UAE. In Musandam (Oman), nests were made of twigs and placed in shallow depressions on gravelly ground, hidden under bushes at the edge of cultivated or grassy fields (Jennings 2010). These nests contained eggs in February and March, while juveniles were recorded in June (Jennings 2010). It is unclear if there is competition for feeding sources and nesting sites with Sand Partridge Ammoperdix heyi (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Released birds pose a threat to this species through genetic contamination from non-native populations;(Panayides et al. 2011).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330977
Taxon name
Aetobatus flagellum
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Aetobatus flagellum
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
myliobatiformes
Family
aetobatidae
Genus
Aetobatus
Species
flagellum
Species authority
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species was previously considered to be conspecific with Aetobatus narutobiei, but the species have since been shown to differ genetically and morphologically (White and Moore 2013).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2d
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This inshore eagle ray occurs throughout UAE waters, but little is known on its population there. It may be taken as bycatch in inshore gillnet fisheries. Most of the distribution of the species in the Arabian Sea region is under extremely intense and increasing demersal fishing pressure, especially off India. Furthermore, the loss and modification of coastal habitats in the Arabian Gulf is a significant concern, especially since this species is known to rely on estuaries during part of its life history. Its relative rarity, large size, and low productivity makes this species particularly susceptible to population decline. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. Given the intense fishing pressures faced by this species throughout the Arabian Seas, and ongoing threats from bycatch and habitat loss, it is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Seas are representative of the status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation, it is suspected to have declined by at least 50% over the past three generation lengths, or about 45 years. It is listed as Endangered A2d.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Longhead Eagle Ray occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is patchily distributed in the Indo-West Pacific from the Arabian Sea region to Indonesia and Malaysia (Last et al. 2016).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Longhead Eagle Ray occurs primarily inshore on the inner continental shelf, and is associated with estuarine habitats (Last et al. 2016), especially where it occurs in the Arabian Gulf (Bishop et al. 2016). It attains a maximum size of 90 cm disc width (DW) with males mature at 50 cm DW and females at 75 cm DW (White and Moore 2013). Size at birth is unknown but the smallest free-swimming individual examined was 23 cm DW. Little else is known of the biology of this species. However, it is suspected to exhibit low fecundity as with other myliobatids which bear litters of up to four offspring (Compagno and Last 1999). As there is no information on this species' maximum age and age at maturity, generation length was inferred as ~15 years based on data for the Bat Ray (Myliobatis californicus) which are reported to have a maximum age of 24 years and an age at maturity of five years (Martin and Cailliet 1988). However, it is noted that the Longhead Eagle Ray reaches a smaller maximum size than this species.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Information pertaining to threats to this species in UAE waters are unavailable. Generally, the Longhead Eagle Ray is highly susceptible to a variety of inshore demersal fisheries, including trawls and gill nets. In the Arabian Sea region, it occurs in areas of intense demersal trawl activity. Marine habitats in the Arabian Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al. 2010), which is likely to impact this species.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
330684
Taxon name
Aetomylaeus milvus
(Valenciennes, 1841)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Aetomylaeus milvus
(Valenciennes, 1841)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
myliobatiformes
Family
myliobatidae
Genus
Aetomylaeus
Species
milvus
Species authority
(Valenciennes, 1841)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Aetomylaeus milvus is considered to be distinct from A. maculatus (Last et al. 2016).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Ocellate Eagle Ray occurs throughout UAE inshore waters. Little is known on the population of this species in UAE waters. It is taken as bycatch in trawl and gill net fisheries, and fishing effort is intense and increasing in much of the Arabian Sea region. The loss and degradation of coastal habitats in the Gulf is a significant concern for inshore species such as this. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by at least 50% over the past three generation lengths, or about 45 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Ocellate Eagle Ray occurs throughout UAE waters. It is restricted to the Arabian Sea region from Oman to India (Gujarat), including the Arabian Gulf (Last et al. 2016). Until recently, this species was confused with the Mottled Eagle Ray (A. maculatus) and possibly the Ornate Eagle Ray (A. vespertilio). Further research is needed to confirm its full distribution.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The biology of the Ocellate Eagle Ray is poorly known, but it likely inhabits inshore areas over soft bottoms to depths of 90 m (Last et al. 2016, Weigmann 2016). This eagle ray displays aggregating behaviour. It reaches a maximum size of 123 cm disc width (DW), and males mature at 50 cm DW (R.W. Jabado pers. comm. 09/02/2017). Female maturity and size at birth are unknown. The species is suspected to have low fecundity similar to other eagle rays, which bear litters of up to four offspring (Compagno and Last 1999, Last and Stevens 2009). As there is no information on this species' maximum age and age at maturity, generation length was inferred as ~15 years based on data for the Bat Ray (Myliobatis californicus) which are reported to have a maximum age of 24 years and an age at maturity of five years (Martin and Cailliet 1988). However, it is noted that the Ocellate Eagle Ray reaches a smaller maximum size than this species.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
This species is impacted by fisheries in the UAE and forms a relatively large portion of all landed batoids. It is impacted by bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range as well. Marine habitats in the Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al. 2010).
History
This is the first assessment for this species.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
330655
Taxon name
Carcharhinus dussumieri
(Müller & Henle, 1839)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Carcharhinus dussumieri
(Müller & Henle, 1839)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
carcharhiniformes
Family
carcharhinidae
Genus
Carcharhinus
Species
dussumieri
Species authority
(Müller & Henle, 1839)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Carcharhinus dussumieri is part of the Carcharhinus seali-dussumieri group that has been revealed to consist of five species: C. dussumieri and C. sealei have recently been re-described, C. coatesi and C. tjutjot have been resurrected as valid species, and a new species, C. humani has been described (White 2012, White and Weigmann 2014).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Whitecheek Shark is common throughout UAE inshore waters. Little specific data are available for this species in the UAE. It has a relatively low reproductive capacity, which causes it to be susceptible to over-exploitation, but it remains common in the Arabian Gulf. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 50-70% over the past three generation lengths, or about 24 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Whitecheek Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it occurs from the northern Arabian Sea in the Arabian Gulf to the southeast coast of India. Bonfil (2003) reported this species from the lower Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, but these records may have been of Human's Whaler Shark (Carcharhinus humani), which was only recently described from this area (White and Weigmann 2014).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Whitecheek Shark is a small species of carcharhinid shark that is common in inshore waters over soft substrates at depths of 0-100 m (Weigmann 2016). It reaches a maximum size of 114 cm total length (TL) (Raeisi et al. 2017). Size at birth is around 28-40 cm TL. This species is placental viviparous and produces litters of 2-5 each year. A study conducted off Iran in the Arabian Gulf reported a longevity of 8 and 13 years for males and females, and both females and males matured at lengths between 60 to 68 cm (Raeisi et al. 2017). Age at maturity data are not available for this species, but the Atlantic Sharpnose Shark (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae), which reaches a similar maximum size of 96 cm TL (Carlson and Baremore 2003), is applied as a proxy for age at maturity (3-4 years for females and 2-3.5 years for males). When applying an age at first reproduction of 3 years and longevity of 13 years, its estimated generation length is 8 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Information pertaining to threats specific to the UAE are unavailable. This species is impacted by target (for fins and their valuable meat) and bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range. Marine habitats in the Arabian Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al. 2010).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
330632
Taxon name
Siganus canaliculatus
(Park, 1797)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Siganus canaliculatus
(Park, 1797)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
actinopterygii
Order
perciformes
Family
siganidae
Genus
Siganus
Species
canaliculatus
Species authority
(Park, 1797)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
There is some uncertainty about the taxonomic validity of Siganus fuscescens versus S. canaliculatus.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This coastal species occurs throughout UAE waters. It is targeted by commercial fisheries in the UAE and elsewhere in the Arabian Gulf and Sea of Oman. Stock assessments conducted for Abu Dhabi in 2004, 2013 and 2018 considered this species overexploited. Catch in Abu Dhabi declined by 75% since at least 2006, or over the past 13 years. Its population status in areas neighboring the UAE is not known, but it is heavily exploited elsewhere as well. Based on catch data and stock assessments, it is inferred this species has undergone a decline of at least 70% over the past three generation lengths, or 15 years. It is listed as Endangered A2bd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, itis widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific (Woodland 1984, 2001). Its depth range is about 0-50 m (Woodland 2001).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species schools in shallow, coastal waters to 40 m depth (Woodland 1984). It usually observed on rocky and sandy seaweed bottoms (Carpenter et al. 1997a), in and around the mouths of rivers in turbulent waters (Woodland 2001), and on hard-bottom structures (E. Abdulqader pers. comm. 2014). School size decreases with age, and juveniles often occur in very large schools in shallow bays and coral reef flats. This species feeds by scraping algae from rocks and corals, and to a lesser extent on seagrasses (Woodland 1984, 2001). The maximum total length is 30 cm (Randall 1995). Spawning appears to be synchronized with the lunar cycle and it is a multiple spawner (Hoque et al. 1999). Longevity is estimated as 7.8 years off UAE and mean size and age at first sexual maturity are 21.5 cm fork length and 1.9 years for males and 25.7 cm and 2.1 years for females (Grandcourt et al. 2007). When applying an age at first reproduction of 2 years and longevity of 8 years, its estimated generation length is 5 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overfishing is a major threat to this species in the UAE (Grandcourt et al. 2014). A study conducted off Bahrain on this species found it to be susceptible to mass mortality events due to Streptococcus iniae bacterial infections (Yuasa et al. 1999). The pervasive level of coastal development within the UAE and Arabian Gulf region has degraded inshore habitats that this species utilizes. Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.