Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

EN

Assessment ID
329963
Taxon name
Porites harrisoni
Veron, 2002
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Porites harrisoni
Veron, 2002
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Invertebrates
Corals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
cnidaria
Class
anthozoa
Order
scleractinia
Family
poritidae
Genus
Porites
Species
harrisoni
Species authority
Veron, 2002
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This stony coral is common and can be a dominant species along both coasts of the UAE. It can survive sedimentation and has low susceptibility to bleaching, but it is particularly susceptible to disease and extensive reduction of coral reef habitat due to a combination of threats. This species is common in western Abu Dhabi and becomes less common northeast along the UAE coast to Fujairah. Species-specific population trend data are not available, therefore are based on the data available for the genus. Despite its relatively low susceptibility to bleaching, the most recent bleaching event (2017) resulted in over 75% mortality of Porites in shallow-water habitats of Abu Dhabi; no additional data are available from elsewhere in the UAE. However, as the majority of this species' distribution in the UAE occurs in Abu Dhabi, the overall population decline likely approaches that documented in Abu Dhabi and certainly exceeds 50%. This species is therefore listed as Endangered A2bc. No regional adjustment is made to the Endangered listing.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Endemism Notes
Endemism Notes
Regionally endemic to Northwest Indian Ocean (Gulf, Sea of Oman, Arabian Sea, Red Sea)
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is reported from UAE waters in both the Gulf and Sea of Oman (Riegl et al. 2012, Grizzle et al. 2016).It is regionally endemic to the northwestern Indian Ocean, where it is known from the Gulf, Sea of Oman, Arabian Sea and Red Sea (Veron 2000).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in shallow fringing reefs, generally to depths of 15 m. It prefers areas of low exposure, and tolerates sedimented conditions well (Sheppard and Sheppard 1991).The age of first maturity of most reef building corals is typically three to eight years (Wallace 1999) and therefore we assume that average age of mature individuals is greater than eight years. Total longevity is not known, but likely to be more than ten years. Furthermore, based on average sizes and growth rates, we assume that average generation length is 10 years, unless otherwise stated. Therefore, any population decline rates for the Red List assessment are measured over at least 30 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the Gulf, the major threats to corals include extreme and increasing temperature variability due to climate change, as well as direct destruction and increased turbidity caused by coastal construction (Riegl et al. 2012). Although bleaching thresholds in the Gulf are the highest recorded in the world (Riegl et al. 2012), bleaching events in the UAE have resulted in significant mortality (such as in 1996-1998, 2002, 2010 and 2017) and slow recovery (Burt et al. 2008). In Abu Dhabi, the most recent coral bleaching event resulted in nearly 95% of corals bleaching, and by April 2018, mortality reached 73% (Burt et al. 2019). This event resulted in mass mortality of even the more stress-tolerant corals such as poritids and merulinids (Burt et al. 2019). Coastal development, particularly large-scale offshore real estate developments and sedimentation associated with reclamation, has directly buried coral reefs in the Gulf (Burt et al. 2008, 2013; Burt 2014; Burt and Bartholomew 2019). In the Sea of Oman, UAE reefs have experienced major hurricanes and harmful algal blooms that caused high coral mortality and shifted community structure (Bauman et al. 2010, Foster et al. 2011).The genus is not particularly susceptible to bleaching, experiencing low mortality during three major bleaching events in the Gulf (Riegl et al. 2012). However, it is more prone to disease than many other corals (Riegl et al. 2012). Coral disease has emerged as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide and is a major cause of reef deterioration (Weil 2006). The numbers of diseases and coral species affected, as well as the distribution of diseases have all increased dramatically within the last decade (Porter et al. 2001, Green and Bruckner 2000, Sutherland et al. 2004, Weil 2004). Coral disease epizootics have resulted in significant losses of coral cover and were implicated in the dramatic decline of acroporids in the Florida Keys (Aronson and Precht 2001, Porter et al. 2001, Patterson et al. 2002). In the Indo-Pacific, disease is also on the rise with disease outbreaks recently reported from the Great Barrier Reef (Willis et al. 2004), Marshall Islands (Jacobson 2006) and the northwestern Hawaiian Islands (Aeby et al. 2006). Increased coral disease levels on the Great Barrier Reef were correlated with increased ocean temperatures (Willis et al. 2004) supporting the prediction that disease levels will be increasing with higher sea surface temperatures. Escalating anthropogenic stressors combined with the threats associated with global climate change of increases in coral disease, frequency and duration of coral bleaching and ocean acidification place coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific at high risk of collapse.Globally, the major threat to corals is global climate change, in particular, temperature extremes leading to bleaching and increased susceptibility to disease, increased severity of ENSO events and storms, and ocean acidification. In addition to global climate change, corals are also threatened by a number of localized threats. Localized threats to corals include fisheries, human development (industry, settlement, tourism, and transportation), changes in native species dynamics (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), invasive species (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), dynamite fishing, chemical fishing, pollution from agriculture and industry, domestic pollution, sedimentation, and human recreation and tourism activities.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329947
Taxon name
Pocillopora damicornis
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Pocillopora damicornis
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Invertebrates
Corals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
cnidaria
Class
anthozoa
Order
scleractinia
Family
pocilloporidae
Genus
Pocillopora
Species
damicornis
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This coral is known from the Sea of Oman coast of the UAE; it does not occur along the Gulf coast. Based on the known coral reefs along the Sea of Oman coast, the extent of occurrence is likely less than 400 km<sup>2</sup> and the area of occupancy is less than 80 km<sup>2</sup>. This species appears to be particularly susceptible to adverse effects as a result of harmful algal blooms, which resulted in a local extirpation (e.g., at Dibba Reef, Fujairah). Some recovery was documented after the bloom; in the absence of recent, major disturbances, this species is likely to continue to recover, though no current data are available to validate this assumption. However, in light of ongoing and accelerating threats (harmful algal blooms, coral bleaching) resulting from global climate change, this species occurs in less than 5 locations and is experiencing an ongoing decline in the area and quality of habitat. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered B1ab(iii)+B2ab(iii). No regional adjustment is made to the Endangered listing.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is known from UAE waters in the Sea of Oman (Bento 2009, Foster et al. 2011, Bento et al. 2016, Grizzle et al. 2016). Elsewhere, this species is widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific and Eastern Tropical Pacific.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in all shallow water habitats from exposed reef fronts to mangrove swamps and wharf piles. This species is found in mono-specific stands or multi-species reefs throughout its range from near the surface to a maximum depth of 20 m. In the South China Sea and the Gulf of Siam, it is commonly found from 1-15 m, rarely 18-20 m (Titlyanov and Titlyanova 2002); in Panama, it is found from 0.5-6 m (Sheppard 1982). This species is relatively tolerant of sedimentation and low salinity, as long as there is adequate water motion. Colonies reproduce by fragmentation and by sexual reproduction (broadcast spawning) (Hodgson 1998).Pocillopora species are preyed on by various consumers, including fishes, hermit crabs and gastropods (Glynn 2001, 2003). Mutualistic symbiotic relationships with crab (Trapezia sp.) and alpheid shrimp can help protect the coral from the attack of the crown-of-thorns sea star, Acanthaster planci (Glynn 2001).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the Gulf, the major threats to corals include extreme and increasing temperature variability due to climate change, as well as direct destruction and increased turbidity caused by coastal construction (Riegl et al. 2012). Although bleaching thresholds in the Gulf are the highest recorded in the world (Riegl et al. 2012), bleaching events in the UAE have resulted in significant mortality (such as in 1996-1998, 2002, 2010 and 2017) and slow recovery (Burt et al. 2008). In Abu Dhabi, the most recent coral bleaching event resulted in nearly 95% of corals bleaching, and by April 2018, mortality reached 73% (Burt et al. 2019). This event resulted in mass mortality of even the more stress-tolerant corals such as poritids and merulinids (Burt et al. 2019). Coastal development, particularly large-scale offshore real estate developments and sedimentation associated with reclamation, has directly buried coral reefs in the Gulf (Burt et al. 2008, 2013; Burt 2014; Burt and Bartholomew 2019). In the Sea of Oman, UAE reefs have experienced major hurricanes and harmful algal blooms that caused high coral mortality and shifted community structure (Bauman et al. 2010, Foster et al. 2011).Globally, the major threat to corals is global climate change, in particular, temperature extremes leading to bleaching and increased susceptibility to disease, increased severity of ENSO events and storms, and ocean acidification. In the Eastern Tropical Pacific, major reef-building corals, including species of Pocillopora, Porites, Pavona and Gardinoseris, catastrophically declined in the Galápagos Archipelago and Cocos Island after 1983. Pocilloporid coral mortality was high, ranging from 51% at Caño Island to 76-85% in Panama and 97-100% in the Galápagos Islands (Glynn et al. 1988). The observed recovery was in large part nullified by the 1997-98 ENSO event (Glynn 2000). In Palau, this species exhibited variable bleaching (0-50%) and low mortality during the 1998 bleaching event (Brunno et al. 2001). Other threats include the crown-of-thorns starfish, Acanthaster planci (Glynn 1994, 2000, 2002). These voracious predators of reef-building corals are found throughout the Pacific and Indian Oceans, and the Red Sea. Populations of the crown-of-thorns starfish have greatly increased since the 1970s and have been known to wipe out large areas of coral reef habitat. Increased breakouts have become a major threat to some species, and have contributed to the overall decline and reef destruction in the Indo-Pacific region. The effects of such an outbreak include the reduction of abundance and surface cover of living coral, reduction of species diversity and composition, and overall reduction in habitat area. Coral disease has emerged as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide and a major cause of reef deterioration (Weil 2006). The numbers of diseases and coral species affected, as well as the distribution of diseases have all increased dramatically within the last decade (Porter et al. 2001, Green and Bruckner 2000, Sutherland et al. 2004, Weil 2004). Coral disease epizootics have resulted in significant losses of coral cover and were implicated in the dramatic decline of acroporids in the Florida Keys (Aronson and Precht 2001, Porter et al. 2001, Patterson et al. 2002). In the Indo-Pacific, disease is also on the rise with disease outbreaks recently reported from the Great Barrier Reef (Willis et al. 2004), Marshall Islands (Jacobson 2006) and the northwestern Hawaiian Islands (Aeby et al. 2006). Increased coral disease levels on the GBR were correlated with increased ocean temperatures (Willis et al. 2004) supporting the prediction that disease levels will be increasing with higher sea surface temperatures. Escalating anthropogenic stressors combined with the threats associated with global climate change of increases in coral disease, frequency and duration of coral bleaching and ocean acidification place coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific at high risk of collapse.Harvesting for the curio trade has virtually eliminated pocilloporid corals from Acapulco (Mexico), Bahia Culebra (Costa Rica), Taboga Island (Panama), and parts of Ecuador (Glynn 2001). However, this activity is now largely excluded from Costa Rica and Panama (H. Guzmán pers. comm. 2008).Localized threats to corals include fisheries, human development (industry, settlement, tourism, and transportation), changes in native species dynamics (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), invasive species (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), dynamite fishing, chemical fishing, pollution from agriculture and industry, domestic pollution, sedimentation, and human recreation and tourism activities.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329932
Taxon name
Pavona decussata
(Dana, 1846)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Pavona decussata
(Dana, 1846)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Invertebrates
Corals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
cnidaria
Class
anthozoa
Order
scleractinia
Family
agariciidae
Genus
Pavona
Species
decussata
Species authority
(Dana, 1846)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This coral is rare along the Gulf coast of the UAE and has not been reported from the east coast. The most important known threat for this species is extensive reduction of coral reef habitat due to a combination of threats. Species-specific population data are limited; however, where available, declines have exceeded 50% and it has completely disappeared from Dubai. At this time, there is no reason to suspect that it is in better condition elsewhere in the UAE; thus, it is suspected that this species has declined by at least 50% over the past three generations (30 years). Therefore, this species is listed as Endangered A2bc. No regional adjustment is made to the Endangered listing.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species likely occurs along both coasts of the UAE (Veron 2000, Riegl et al. 2012), though it has not been specifically reported from the east coast (R. Bento pers. comm. 2019). Elsewhere, this species is widely distributed in the Indo-Pacific.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in most reef environments. It is commonly found from 3-11 m, rarely from 12-15 m, in the South China Sea and Gulf of Siam (Titlyanov and Titlyanova 2002). It may form fields up to several meters across.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the Gulf, the major threats to corals include extreme and increasing temperature variability due to climate change, as well as direct destruction and increased turbidity caused by coastal construction (Riegl et al. 2012). This species appears to be somewhat resilient to elevated sea surface temperatures in some localities (e.g., Jones 2008, Sutthacheep et al. 2013). Although bleaching thresholds in the Gulf are the highest recorded in the world (Riegl et al. 2012), bleaching events in the UAE have resulted in significant mortality (such as in 1996-1998, 2002, 2010 and 2017) and slow recovery (Burt et al. 2008) as well as shifts in community structure (e.g,. Bento et al. 2016, Grizzle et al. 2016, Burt et al. 2019 ). In Abu Dhabi, the most recent coral bleaching event resulted in nearly 95% of corals bleaching, and by April 2018, mortality reached 73% (Burt et al. 2019). This event resulted in mass mortality of even the more stress-tolerant corals such as poritids and merulinids (Burt et al. 2019). Coastal development, particularly large-scale offshore real estate developments and sedimentation associated with reclamation, has directly buried coral reefs in the Gulf (Burt et al. 2008, 2013; Burt 2014; Burt and Bartholomew 2019). In the Sea of Oman, UAE reefs have experienced major hurricanes and harmful algal blooms that caused high coral mortality and shifted community structure (Bauman et al. 2010, Foster et al. 2011).Globally, the major threat to corals is global climate change, in particular, temperature extremes leading to bleaching and increased susceptibility to disease, increased severity of ENSO events and storms, and ocean acidification. Pavona species have a high sensitivity to extreme elevated temperatures that interfere with reproduction and recruitment (Glynn et al. 2000) but are not particularly susceptible to bleaching compared to other genera (Gleason 1993). This species appears to be somewhat resilient to elevated water temperatures, as evidenced by limited bleaching and mortality during mass bleaching events in the Andaman Sea (Phongsuwan and Chansang 2012) and Gulf of Thailand (Sutthacheep et al. 2013). Coral disease has emerged as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide and a major cause of reef deterioration (Weil 2006). The numbers of diseases and coral species affected, as well as the distribution of diseases have all increased dramatically within the last decade (Porter et al. 2001, Green and Bruckner 2000, Sutherland et al. 2004, Weil 2004). Coral disease epizootics have resulted in significant losses of coral cover and were implicated in the dramatic decline of acroporids in the Florida Keys (Aronson and Precht 2001, Porter et al. 2001, Patterson et al. 2002). In the Indo-Pacific, disease is also on the rise with disease outbreaks recently reported from the Great Barrier Reef (Willis et al. 2004), Marshall Islands (Jacobson 2006) and the northwestern Hawaiian Islands (Aeby et al. 2006). Increased coral disease levels on the GBR were correlated with increased ocean temperatures (Willis et al. 2004) supporting the prediction that disease levels will be increasing with higher sea surface temperatures. Escalating anthropogenic stressors combined with the threats associated with global climate change of increases in coral disease, frequency and duration of coral bleaching and ocean acidification place coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific at high risk of collapse.Localized threats to corals include fisheries, human development (industry, settlement, tourism, and transportation), changes in native species dynamics (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), invasive species (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), dynamite fishing, chemical fishing, pollution from agriculture and industry, domestic pollution, sedimentation, and human recreation and tourism activities. The severity of these combined threats to the global population of each individual species is not known.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329926
Taxon name
Porites nodifera
Klunzinger, 1879
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Porites nodifera
Klunzinger, 1879
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Invertebrates
Corals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
cnidaria
Class
anthozoa
Order
scleractinia
Family
poritidae
Genus
Porites
Species
nodifera
Species authority
Klunzinger, 1879
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This stony coral is found along both coasts of the UAE. While it can be locally common in some areas, it is rare in the Gulf and requires high quality coral habitat. This species is common in western Abu Dhabi and becomes less common northeast along the UAE coast to Fujairah. Species-specific population trend data are not available, therefore are based on the data available for the genus. Despite its relatively low susceptibility to bleaching, the most recent bleaching event (2017) resulted in over 75% mortality of Porites in shallow-water habitats of Abu Dhabi; no additional data are available from elsewhere in the UAE. However, as the majority of this species' distribution in the UAE occurs in Abu Dhabi, the overall population decline likely approaches that documented in Abu Dhabi and certainly exceeds 50%. This species is therefore listed as Endangered A2bc. No regional adjustment is made to the Endangered listing.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Endemism Notes
Regionally endemic to Northwest Indian Ocean (Gulf, Sea of Oman, Arabian Sea, Red Sea)
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is reported from UAE waters in the Gulf and Sea of Oman (Riegl et al. 2012, R. Bento pers. obs. 2019).It is regionally endemic to the northwestern Indian Ocean, where it is known from the Gulf, Sea of Oman, Arabian Sea and Red Sea (Veron 2000).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in shallow water, generally less than 5 m but occasionally to 15 m. It is tolerant of high salinities, up to 48 ppt (Sheppard and Sheppard 1991).The age of first maturity of most reef building corals is typically three to eight years (Wallace 1999) and therefore we assume that average age of mature individuals is greater than eight years. Total longevity is not known, but likely to be more than ten years. Furthermore, based on average sizes and growth rates, we assume that average generation length is 10 years, unless otherwise stated. Therefore, any population decline rates for the Red List assessment are measured over at least 30 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the Gulf, the major threats to corals include extreme and increasing temperature variability due to climate change, as well as direct destruction and increased turbidity caused by coastal construction (Riegl et al. 2012). Although bleaching thresholds in the Gulf are the highest recorded in the world (Riegl et al. 2012), bleaching events in the UAE have resulted in significant mortality (such as in 1996-1998, 2002, 2010 and 2017) and slow recovery (Burt et al. 2008). In Abu Dhabi, the most recent coral bleaching event resulted in nearly 95% of corals bleaching, and by April 2018, mortality reached 73% (Burt et al. 2019). This event resulted in mass mortality of even the more stress-tolerant corals such as poritids and merulinids (Burt et al. 2019). Coastal development, particularly large-scale offshore real estate developments and sedimentation associated with reclamation, has directly buried coral reefs in the Gulf (Burt et al. 2008, 2013; Burt 2014; Burt and Bartholomew 2019). In the Sea of Oman, UAE reefs have experienced major hurricanes and harmful algal blooms that caused high coral mortality and shifted community structure (Bauman et al. 2010, Foster et al. 2011).The genus is not particularly susceptible to bleaching, but is more prone to disease than many other corals. Coral disease has emerged as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide and is a major cause of reef deterioration (Weil 2006). The numbers of diseases and coral species affected, as well as the distribution of diseases have all increased dramatically within the last decade (Porter et al. 2001, Green and Bruckner 2000, Sutherland et al. 2004, Weil 2004). Coral disease epizootics have resulted in significant losses of coral cover and were implicated in the dramatic decline of acroporids in the Florida Keys (Aronson and Precht 2001, Porter et al. 2001, Patterson et al. 2002). In the Indo-Pacific, disease is also on the rise with disease outbreaks recently reported from the Great Barrier Reef (Willis et al. 2004), Marshall Islands (Jacobson 2006) and the northwestern Hawaiian Islands (Aeby et al. 2006). Increased coral disease levels on the Great Barrier Reef were correlated with increased ocean temperatures (Willis et al. 2004) supporting the prediction that disease levels will be increasing with higher sea surface temperatures. Escalating anthropogenic stressors combined with the threats associated with global climate change of increases in coral disease, frequency and duration of coral bleaching and ocean acidification place coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific at high risk of collapse.Globally, the major threat to corals is global climate change, in particular, temperature extremes leading to bleaching and increased susceptibility to disease, increased severity of ENSO events and storms, and ocean acidification. In addition to global climate change, corals are also threatened by a number of localized threats. Localized threats to corals include fisheries, human development (industry, settlement, tourism, and transportation), changes in native species dynamics (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), invasive species (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), dynamite fishing, chemical fishing, pollution from agriculture and industry, domestic pollution, sedimentation, and human recreation and tourism activities.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329919
Taxon name
Epinephelus areolatus
(Forsskål, 1775)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Epinephelus areolatus
(Forsskål, 1775)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
actinopterygii
Order
perciformes
Family
epinephelidae
Genus
Epinephelus
Species
areolatus
Species authority
(Forsskål, 1775)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bcd+4bcd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species inhabits both soft and hard bottom habitats throughout UAE waters. It is exploited by grouper fisheries, and it appears likely that this species is overfished in the UAE. During the period from 2005-2016, a 67% decline in landings of this species occurred off Abu Dhabi. In addition, due to severe declines in Gulf coral reefs, this species may also be impacted by habitat degradation. The status of population(s) outside the UAE is not well-understood, though it is also heavily exploited elsewhere, especially off Oman and Iran. Based on fish market observations and catch data, it is inferred that this species has declined by at least 50-60% in the UAE since about 1995, or a little over one generation length (29 years). Fishing effort is expected to remain the same or increase in the future time period over the next two generations. Therefore, it is listed as Endangered A2bcd+4bcd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widespread in the Indo-West Pacific (Russell and Houston 1989, Randall and Heemstra 1991, Randall et al. 2003). Its depth range is 2 to 200 metres.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This continental shelf species is usually found in turbid water in seagrass beds or silty sand bottoms around isolated small rock outcrops, as well as near dead coral or soft coral as deep as 200 metres (Randall and Ben-Tuvia 1983, Leis 1987, Randall and Heemstra 1991). Juveniles are common to depths of 80 m (Kailola et al. 1993). It has also been observed on artificial reefs in Hong Kong (AFCD 2001). It feeds on fish and benthic invertebrates, primarily prawns and crabs (Parrish 1987, Randall and Heemstra 1991, Salini et al. 1994, Kulbicki et al. 2005). It is thought to spawn during seasonal periods and form spawning aggregations (Shapiro 1987). Maximum total length is 47 cm and maximum weight is 1.4 kg (Moran et al. 1988). The maximum reported age for this species is 15 years (Shapiro 1987), but a study conducted in northern Oman recorded a maximum age of 39 years and total length of 48 cm (J. McIlwain unpublished data). The length and age at first sexual maturity is 22.8 cm and 2 years for males and 23.5 cm and 2 years for females, respectively (Mahmoud 2009). When applying an age at first reproduction of 2 years and longevity of 39 years, its estimated generation length is 20 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overexploitation is a major threat to this species in the UAE. Its occurrence in the trap (gargoor) fishery as ghost fishing may also cause mortality in this species. Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329912
Taxon name
Lutjanus argentimaculatus
(Forsskål, 1775)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Lutjanus argentimaculatus
(Forsskål, 1775)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
actinopterygii
Order
perciformes
Family
lutjanidae
Genus
Lutjanus
Species
argentimaculatus
Species authority
(Forsskål, 1775)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bcd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This reef and estuarine-associated species occurs throughout UAE waters. It is heavily exploited and very highly-valued in the Arabian Gulf, including the UAE. A 2013 Abu Dhabi stock assessment concluded it is overexploited, especially due to the high rate of juvenile retention, which has led to growth overfishing. Though catch quantity has been relatively low over the time period from 2009-2018, it has virtually disappeared from fisheries catch on both coasts of the UAE. In addition, mangrove and estuarine degradation in the Arabian Gulf region is serious, and a likely additional threat to nursery habitat for this species. The status of population(s) outside the UAE is not well-understood, but it is exploited elsewhere as well. Based on stock assessment, catch data and fish market observations, this species is inferred to have declined by at least 50% or possibly more than 80% over at least half of a generation length, or the past decade. Three generation lengths is about 75 years, but data are not available to calculate a decline over this period. Considering this species is particularly long-lived and late to maturity, it is intrinsically susceptible to declines from overexploitation. Assuming that the population was stable previous to 2009, we suspect a decline of at least 50% with an expected continuing decline due to fishing effort trends. It is listed as Endangered A2bcd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific (Anderson and Allen 2001). Its depth range is 1 to 120 m (Lieske and Myers 1994).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This reef-associated species often occur in groups around coral reefs and sometimes extends to depths in excess of 100 m. Juveniles and young adults occur in mangrove estuaries, as well as the lower reaches of freshwater streams and tidal creeks (Lieske and Myers 1994, Sommer et al. 1996, Russell et al. 2003). This nocturnal species consumes fishes and crustaceans (Anderson and Allen 2001). The maximum total length is 150 cm (Torres 1991). The natural mortality for this species is measured at 0.158 (Russell et al. 2003). In a cooler part of its range, off eastern Australia, it has been aged at up to 57 years old (Piddocke et al. 2015). Spawning occurs off Abu Dhabi from September to October, longevity is estimated to be 37 years and the mean age and size at first sexual maturity is 14 years and 56.4 cm fork length for females and 13 years and 55.8 cm for males (Grandcourt et al. 2013). When applying an age at first reproduction of 14 years and longevity of 37 years, its estimated generation length is 25.5 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overfishing is a major threat to this species in the UAE (Grandcourt et al. 2013). In addition, juveniles are dependent on mangroves and associated freshwater-influenced areas, which is a habitat that has been destroyed or severely degraded in the Arabian Gulf region as a result of coastal development (A. Al-Kuwari, E. Abdulqader, F. Kaymaram, K. Al-Khalaf, J. Bishop, Q. Alghawzi, S. Alam, S. Hartmann pers. comm. 2013). Historically, mangrove area declined on the Arabian Gulf coast of the UAE, but since the 1990s, mangrove area has increased somewhat in part due to restoration efforts. The percent decline over the entire time period of three generation lengths is poorly understood. Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329909
Taxon name
Glaucostegus granulatus
(Cuvier, 1829)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Glaucostegus granulatus
(Cuvier, 1829)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
rhinopristiformes
Family
glaucostegidae
Genus
Glaucostegus
Species
granulatus
Species authority
(Cuvier, 1829)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Changes to the systematics of Rhinobatos elevated the subgenus Glaucostegus to full generic status and placed this genus into a family of its own: Glaucostegidae (Compagno 2005, Last et al. 2016a). This species is often confused with Glaucostegus typus and Pacific Ocean records of G. granulatus are probably G. typus.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Sharpnose Guitarfish occurs throughout UAE coastal waters, and may be naturally uncommon there. It likely grows slowly and matures late, which causes it to have a low productivity and be particularly susceptible to declines when experiencing exploitation. It is commonly taken in gill net and trawl fisheries, and coastal development is a significant threat. Significant declines of wedgefishes and guitarfishes have been documented in India, Pakistan and Iran. There has been a total ban on fishing for this species in UAE waters in place since 2019. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, and it is not known how individuals occupying the UAE are connected with the broader population of the Arabian Seas region, there is no information available to suggest that its population status differs in the UAE as compared to other parts of its range in the region. Given the threats faced by this species in other parts of the Arabian Seas region, and ongoing threats from discarding and habitat loss in the UAE, it is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Seas are representative of the status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 39 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Sharpnose Guitarfish occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is moderately widespread in the northern Indian Ocean from the Arabian Gulf to Sri Lanka.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Sharpnose Guitarfish commonly occurs in intertidal areas, but has been recorded to depths of 119 m (Compagno and Last 1999). It attains a maximum size of at least 229 cm total length (TL) (Last et al. 2016). Size at birth is believed to be around 39 cm TL (Moore et al. 2012), but little else is known of its biology. The estimation of generation length is from the maximum age (19 years) and age at maturity (7 years) taken from the growth curve provided by White et al. (2014) for the Giant Guitarfish (Glaucostegus typus), which gives an estimated generation length of 13 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the UAE, sharks have been impacted by targeted commercial fisheries until 2014 when a ban on export of sharks was imposed (Ministry of Climate Change and Environment). Sharks continue to be impacted by artisanal and bycatch fisheries (Annual Fisheries Statistical Report for Abu Dhabi Emirate 2001-2018), though catch data are not species-specific. This species is impacted by bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range. This species may also be impacted by coastal development and habitat degradation (Moore et al. 2012), especially since juveniles utilize inshore areas as nursery grounds. Marine habitats in the Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and sea-filling), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al. 2010).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329897
Taxon name
Rhynchobatus laevis
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rhynchobatus laevis
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
rhinopristiformes
Family
rhinidae
Genus
Rhynchobatus
Species
laevis
Species authority
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Rhynchobatus laevis is part of the Indo-West Pacific Rhynchobatus djiddensis species-complex. The name R. djiddensis has previously been used widely, leading to poorly-defined taxonomy and distributions for members of the complex (in particular, R. australiae, R. djiddensis, and R. laevis). Rhynchobatus yentinensis Wang, 1933 (described from China) might be applicable to this species or may be a synonym of R. springeri. Further investigation into the taxonomy of 'whitespotted wedgefish' is required, and additional species are likely to be described in the future.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bcd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Smoothnose Wedgefish occurs throughout UAE inshore waters in shallow bays and off river mouths. There has been a total ban on fishing for this species in UAE waters since 2019. The similarity of the three species of Rhynchobatus that occur in the region mean there are few reliable species-specific data available. It is commonly taken as bycatch in gillnet, longline and trawl fisheries and its fins are highly valued in international trade. Coastal development is causing habitat degradation, which may also be impacting this species. Significant declines are known in India, southern Oman, Pakistan and Iran. Little is known on the population of this species in UAE waters. It exhibits slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation, landings data and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 39 years. It is listed as Endangered A2bcd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Smoothnose Wedgefish occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it has a poorly-defined distribution in the Indo-West Pacific due to difficulties in distinguishing between species of Rhynchobatus (Last et al. 2016). It is confirmed in the Arabian Gulf and Sea of Oman (Giles et al. 2016).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs mainly near the coast in shallow bays and off river mouths (Last et al. 2016). Maximum size is unknown but it attains at least 200 cm total length (TL) with males mature at about 130 cm TL (Last et al. 2016). Size at birth is unknown, although the closely related R. djiddensis is born at about 60 cm total length (TL). Maximum age for Rhynchobatus spp. in Australia is 5 years (males) and 12 years (females), but these data were not from the largest individuals (White et al. 2014) and are not reliable for the estimation of generation length. This is therefore estimated from the maximum age (19 years) and age at maturity (7 years) taken from the growth curve provided by White et al. (2014) for the Giant Guitarfish (Glaucostegus typus), which gives an estimated generation length of 13 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
This species is impacted by target and bycatch fisheries. This species may also being impacted by habitat degradation due to coastal development, especially nursery grounds. Marine habitats in the Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al.<em style=""font-size: 12pt; font-family: Georgia;""> 2010).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329896
Taxon name
Rhynchobatus australiae
Whitley, 1939
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rhynchobatus australiae
Whitley, 1939
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
rhinopristiformes
Family
rhinidae
Genus
Rhynchobatus
Species
australiae
Species authority
Whitley, 1939
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Rhynchobatus australiae is part of the Indo-West Pacific Rhynchobatus djiddensis species-complex. The name R. djiddensis has previously been used widely, leading to poorly-defined taxonomy and distributions for members of the complex (in particular, R. australiae, R. djiddensis, and R. laevis). Further investigation into the taxonomy of 'whitespotted wedgefish' is required, and additional species are likely to be described in the future.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bcd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Bottlenose Wedgefish occurs throughout UAE inshore and offshore waters. There has been a total ban on fishing for this species in UAE waters since 2019. The similarity of the three species of Rhynchobatus that occur in the region mean there are few reliable species-specific data available. It is commonly taken as bycatch in gill net, longline and trawl fisheries and its fins are highly valued in international trade. Coastal development is causing habitat degradation, which may also be impacting this species. Significant declines are known in India, southern Oman, Pakistan and Iran. It exhibits slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation, landings data and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 39 years. It is listed as Endangered A2bcd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Bottlenose Wedgefish occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widespread in the Indo-West Pacific (Last et al. 2016, Giles et al. 2016). However, the difficulties in distinguishing between species of Rhynchobatus causes some of its distribution to be uncertain.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in inshore and offshore waters over soft substrates to depths of 60 m or more (Last et al. 2016), but can also be associated with coral reefs. It attains a maximum size of about 300 cm total length (TL) with males mature at about 124 cm TL (Last et al. 2016). Size at birth is unknown, although the closely related R. djiddensis is born at about 60 cm TL. Maximum age for Rhynchobatus spp. in Australia is 5 years (males) and 12 years (females), but these data were not from the largest individuals (White et al. 2014) and are not reliable for the estimation of generation length. This is therefore estimated from the maximum age (19 years) and age at maturity (7 years) taken from the growth curve provided by White et al. (2014) for the Giant Guitarfish (Glaucostegus typus), which gives an estimated generation length of 13 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
This species is impacted by target and bycatch fisheries in the UAE. It may also being impacted by habitat degradation due to coastal development, especially nursery grounds. Marine habitats in the Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al.<em style=""font-size: 12pt; font-family: Georgia;""> 2010). Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329892
Taxon name
Negaprion acutidens
(Rüppell, 1837)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Negaprion acutidens
(Rüppell, 1837)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
carcharhiniformes
Family
carcharhinidae
Genus
Negaprion
Species
acutidens
Species authority
(Rüppell, 1837)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Sharptooth Lemon Shark occurs throughout UAE inshore and offshore waters. In the UAE and neighboring countries, it is a minor component of shark landings, and may be relatively rarely occurring in the area. It is at risk from extensive fishing pressure by longline and gill net fisheries that operate throughout the Arabian Sea region. Extensive habitat degradation and loss due to coastal development in the Arabian Gulf region may also be impacting the species. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by at least 50% over the past three generation lengths, or about 49 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Sharptooth Lemon Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widespread in the Indo-West and Central Pacific (Last and Stevens 2009).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Sharptooth Lemon Shark occurs in shallow inshore and offshore waters near the bottom and is often found on and around coral reefs and on sandy plateaus near coral at depths to at least 30 m (Stevens 1984, Compagno 1998). It is also known to occur around and within the mangrove forests in certain areas of the UAE (Abu Dhabi) and Sudan (Suakin), which may be used as nursery grounds (Bonfil 2003, R. W. Jabado pers. comm. 06/02/2017). The maximum size reported is 340 cm total length (TL) with size at maturity around 220 cm TL for males and females (Compagno et al. 2005). The gestation period is recorded at 10 to 11 months, a reproductive periodicity of two years with a litter size average of 9.3 (6 to 12) and size at birth of 60 cm TL. Growth rates are reported at 12.5 to 15.5 cm per year. The generation length is suspected to be around 16.5 years, similar to that of the Lemon Shark (Negaprion brevirostris), which reaches a similar maximum size (Brown and Gruber 1988).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the UAE, sharks have been impacted by targeted commercial fisheries until 2014 when a ban on export of sharks was imposed (Ministry of Climate Change and Environment). Sharks continue to be impacted by artisanal and bycatch fisheries (Annual Fisheries Statistical Report for Abu Dhabi Emirate 2001-2018), though catch data are not species-specific. Marine habitats in the region have experienced high levels of disturbance and are quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (Sheppard <em style=""font-variant-ligatures: normal;font-variant-caps: normal;orphans: 2; text-align:start;widows: 2;-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;word-spacing:0px"">et al. 2010). Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.