Calidris alpina | UAE National Red List of Birds

Taxa
Calidris alpina | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Location
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Scope (Assessment)
National
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of winter visitors and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers peak between October and February, particularly along the coast (Richardson 1990). Single non-breeding individuals remain over summer in the UAE (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Habitats and Ecology
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits coastal mudflats and creeks along the coast (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). During migration, it also occurs on wetlands further inland, including at sewage treatment plants, brackish pools and pond edges (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere during the non-breeding season it is omnivorous, consuming mostly polychaete worms and small gastropods, as well as insects, crustaceans, bivalves, plant matter and occasionally small fish (Cramp and Simmons 1977, del Hoyo et al. 1996). The species is migratory. It breeds in loose colonies in moist arctic tundra and migrates in large groups of up to 1,500 individuals to the non-breeding grounds along tropical and subtropical coastlines (Cramp and Simmons 1977, del Hoyo et al. 1996). Some juveniles may remain in the non-breeding range all year (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a relatively large non-breeding population in the UAE, which is stable at high numbers. Therefore, the species is listed as Least Concern at the national level.
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution could affect this species in UAE, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown. Elsewhere in its range (which could be relevant to species that pass-through or over-winter in UAE) the;species is significantly threatened by the loss of its breeding habitat though afforestation of moorland (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Lavers and Haines-Young 1997).;Additionally, important migratory stop-over habitats are threatened by petroleum pollution, wetland drainage for irrigation, peat-extraction, reedbed mowing and burning, and abandonment and changing land management practices leading to scrub and reed overgrowth (Grishanov 2006). The species is also susceptible to avian influenza (strain H5N1 in particular) and is therefore threatened by outbreaks of the virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006). Climate change is likely to have an effect on this species in the future.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species would have qualified as Least Concern in 1996. Although the population size may have been small in 1996, it is assumed to have still have exceeded 1,000 mature individuals..
Scientific Name Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Calidris alpina Animalia Chordata Aves Charadriiformes Scolopacidae Calidris