Limosa limosa | UAE National Red List of Birds

Taxa
Limosa limosa | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Location
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Scope (Assessment)
National
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is fairly common between August and March throughout the country, with the highest numbers between July and November (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). A small number of non-breeding individuals may stay over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Habitats and Ecology
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in freshwater habitats, including marshes, creeks, freshwater margins and damp grassland, but also in more saline habitats like mudflats, estuaries and tidal pools (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere itconsists of insects, worms, molluscs, crustaceans, fish eggs, and the spawn and tadpoles of frogs(Johnsgard 1981, del Hoyo et al. 1996). Particularly during winter and on migration the species will also take plant material(Cramp and Simmons 1983, Lourenço et al. 2010). The species is migratory; birds wintering in the UAE breed between April and mid-June in central Eurasia. Part of the population may winter further south in sub-Sahara Africa. Many one-year-old birds remain in the wintering range during the summer. During migration and winter, the species is gregarious(del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted, but increasing non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Vulnerable. On a global scale, the species is listed as Near Threatened due to a rapid decline in recent years. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species is retained as Vulnerable at the national level.
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main threats to this species may be from changes in coastal land-use, and potentially oil pollution; but the severity of such threats are uncertain.Given knowledge of the species's global status, a range of other threats outside of the UAE could be impacting individuals that visit the country. Loss of nesting habitat owing to wetland drainage and agricultural intensification, and conversely abandonment in some parts of the range, are the most significant threats (Mischenko 2008,;Kentie et al. 2013). Detrimental activities include the conversion of wet meadows to arable land and loss of habitat to development (Tucker and Heath 1994), increased fertilisation and drainage of grassland;(Roodbergen and Teunissen 2014), earlier and more frequent cutting as farmers adapt to climate change (Kleijn;et al.;2010), spring burning and scrub encroachment (A. Mischenko;in litt.;2007);and possibly disturbance by walkers (Holm and Laursen 2009).;On intensively grazed pastures, trampling is a major cause of nest loss, and a switch to monoculture on arable land reduces the supply of insects on which the species feeds (Kentie;et al. 2013).;In some areas, grassland turnover from 'natural, flower-rich, diverse and wet' to silage monoculture leads to a loss of nests with eggs and chicks due to mowing and to starvation of chicks due to a lack of food (Schekkerman and Beintema 2007).;A study in the central regions of European Russia suggests that a significant decline in spring flood levels during the last two decades, as a result climate change, has strengthened the negative impact of agricultural abandonment (A. Mischenko in litt. 2016).;Habitat fragmentation may cause problems for this species, which nests in dispersed colonies and sub-colonies as protection against predators, hence productivity may be low in such areas. Indeed, sink locations have been documented for the species, where birds recruited from good quality habitat disperse to low quality habitats (often suffering high predation), effectively losing these individuals to the population. This has repercussions for the effectiveness of agri-environment measures (Kentie;et al. 2015, Leigh;et al. 2017). There is a marked decrease in the density of breeding birds near to roads, particularly those with heavy traffic (van der Zande;et al.;1980, Reijnen;et al. 1996). Natal philopatry means that a decrease in local recruitment could prove catastrophic for individual breeding sites (Kruk;et al.;1998).Threats on migration include pollution, human disturbance, habitat reclamation for tidal energy plants, aquaculture ponds, land conversion for agriculture, urban expansion and agricultural intensification at rice paddies.;Hunting has been another significant threat, although France has now followed the rest of the European Union (EU) in implementing a five-year ban on hunting of the species, beginning in 2008 (I. Burfield in litt. 2008), which was extended in 2013 for a further five years. Outside the EU, hunting is known to occur, but its scale and impact is unknown. Water pollution is probably an issue in parts of the species's range (H. Hötker in litt. 2005), although the effects of the release of some pollutants, like untreated sewage, on the species may be minor as long as there are several alternative prey present at a site (Alves et al. 2012).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is thought that the species population would have been lower in 1996, qualifying as Endangered (D), however downlisted by one category to VU on the basis of the larger and LC global population at that time.
Scientific Name Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Limosa limosa Animalia Chordata Aves Charadriiformes Scolopacidae Limosa