RE

Assessment ID
ISLNRL202566
Taxon name
Rallus aquaticus
Uploaded by
Natural Science Institute of Iceland
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rallus aquaticus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Rallus
Species
aquaticus
Species authority
Location and scope
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Iceland
Country ISO code(s)
IS
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2025
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Aldís Erna Pálsdóttir Kristinn Haukur Skarphéðinsson and Borgný Katrínardóttir
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. (2012). Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland Switzerland and Cambridge UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
No
Marine
No
Publication
Náttúrufræðistofnun. (2025). Válisti fugla 2025. Fjölrit Náttúrufræðistofnunar nr. 61. Náttúrufræðistofnun. DOI: 10.33112/1027-832X.151
Assessment ID
ISLNRL202565
Taxon name
Alle alle
Uploaded by
Natural Science Institute of Iceland
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Alle alle
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Alle
Species
alle
Species authority
Location and scope
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Iceland
Country ISO code(s)
IS
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2025
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Aldís Erna Pálsdóttir Kristinn Haukur Skarphéðinsson and Borgný Katrínardóttir
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. (2012). Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland Switzerland and Cambridge UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
No
Marine
No
Publication
Náttúrufræðistofnun. (2025). Válisti fugla 2025. Fjölrit Náttúrufræðistofnunar nr. 61. Náttúrufræðistofnun. DOI: 10.33112/1027-832X.151
Assessment ID
ISLNRL202564
Taxon name
Passer domesticus
Uploaded by
Natural Science Institute of Iceland
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Passer domesticus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Passer
Species
domesticus
Species authority
Location and scope
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Iceland
Country ISO code(s)
IS
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2025
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Aldís Erna Pálsdóttir Kristinn Haukur Skarphéðinsson and Borgný Katrínardóttir
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. (2012). Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland Switzerland and Cambridge UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
No
Marine
No
Publication
Náttúrufræðistofnun. (2025). Válisti fugla 2025. Fjölrit Náttúrufræðistofnunar nr. 61. Náttúrufræðistofnun. DOI: 10.33112/1027-832X.151
Assessment ID
Hbrevis2024
Taxon name
Hoplocampa brevis
Klug, 1816
Uploaded by
JNCC
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hoplocampa brevis
Klug, 1816
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Invertebrates
Insects
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
arthropoda
Class
insecta
Order
hymenoptera
Family
tenthredinidae
Genus
Hoplocampa
Species
brevis
Species authority
Klug, 1816
National taxonomy system
UKSI
Unique national taxonomic ID
NHMSYS0020481257
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Great Britain
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
Country ISO code(s)
GB-SCT
GB-ENG
GB-WLS
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
There have been no records since 1967, despite a large increase in the amount of sawfly recording, particularly in the south-east of England from where the species was formerly noted. As a result, this species is categorised as Regionally Extinct.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2024
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Andy Musgrove
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. 2nd Edition, IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK plus regional guidelines v.10
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
No
Marine
No
Publication
Musgrove, A.J. 2024. A review of the status of sawflies of Great Britain - Phase 3: The Tenthredinidae (subfamily Nematinae). Natural England.
Assessment ID
2023-130
Taxon name
Phengaris alcon
Uploaded by
Red List of Andorra
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Phengaris alcon
Common name(s)
Formiguera petita (ca)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Invertebrates
Insects
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Phengaris
Species
alcon
Species authority
Location and scope
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Andorra
Country ISO code(s)
AD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Qualifying criteria (if given)
criteria_unknown
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
General lack of data on butterflies. A new specific Red List would be needed.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2023
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Jordi Nicolau i Vila | Jordi Dalmau i Ausàs | Sebastià Semene Guitart | Clara Pladevall | Gaël Aleix | Johan Espunyes | Roger Caritg | Manel Niel | Andreu Ubach | Constantí Stephanescu
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K. ii + 30pp. plus regional guidelines v.4.0
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
No
Marine
No
Publication
INTUITIV (2023). Llista vermella de la fauna vertebrada d'Andorra - Validació de l'evaluació parcial 2023. Workshop Report. INTUITIV & Govern d'Andorra. 21pp.
Assessment ID
2023-106
Taxon name
Streptopelia turtur
Uploaded by
Red List of Andorra
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Streptopelia turtur
Common name(s)
Tórtora vulgar (ca)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Streptopelia
Species
turtur
Species authority
Location and scope
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Andorra
Country ISO code(s)
AD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Qualifying criteria (if given)
criteria_unknown
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
No sign of nesting for many years.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2023
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Jordi Nicolau i Vila | Jordi Dalmau i Ausàs | Sebastià Semene Guitart | Clara Pladevall | Gaël Aleix | Johan Espunyes | Roger Caritg | Manel Niel | Martí Franch | Àngel Bonada
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K. ii + 30pp. plus regional guidelines v.4.0
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
No
Marine
No
Publication
INTUITIV (2023). Llista vermella de la fauna vertebrada d'Andorra - Validació de l'evaluació parcial 2023. Workshop Report. INTUITIV & Govern d'Andorra. 21pp.
Assessment ID
2023-58
Taxon name
Columba oenas
Uploaded by
Red List of Andorra
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Columba oenas
Common name(s)
Xixella (ca)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Columba
Species
oenas
Species authority
Location and scope
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Andorra
Country ISO code(s)
AD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Qualifying criteria (if given)
criteria_unknown
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2023
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Jordi Nicolau i Vila | Jordi Dalmau i Ausàs | Sebastià Semene Guitart | Clara Pladevall | Gaël Aleix | Johan Espunyes | Roger Caritg | Manel Niel | Martí Franch | Àngel Bonada
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K. ii + 30pp. plus regional guidelines v.4.0
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
No
Marine
No
Publication
INTUITIV (2023). Llista vermella de la fauna vertebrada d'Andorra - Validació de l'evaluació parcial 2023. Workshop Report. INTUITIV & Govern d'Andorra. 21pp.
Assessment ID
2023-21
Taxon name
Mustela putorius
Uploaded by
Red List of Andorra
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Mustela putorius
Common name(s)
Turó (ca)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Mustela
Species
putorius
Species authority
Location and scope
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Andorra
Country ISO code(s)
AD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Qualifying criteria (if given)
criteria_unknown
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2023
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Jordi Nicolau i Vila | Jordi Dalmau i Ausàs | Sebastià Semene Guitart | Clara Pladevall | Gaël Aleix | Johan Espunyes | Roger Caritg | Manel Niel | Pere Aymerich
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K. ii + 30pp. plus regional guidelines v.4.0
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
No
Marine
No
Publication
INTUITIV (2023). Llista vermella de la fauna vertebrada d'Andorra - Validació de l'evaluació parcial 2023. Workshop Report. INTUITIV & Govern d'Andorra. 21pp.
Assessment ID
2023-05
Taxon name
Pelophylax perezi
Uploaded by
Red List of Andorra
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Pelophylax perezi
Common name(s)
Granota verda (ca)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Amphibians
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Pelophylax
Species
perezi
Species authority
Location and scope
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Andorra
Country ISO code(s)
AD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Qualifying criteria (if given)
criteria_unknown
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2023
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Jordi Nicolau i Vila | Jordi Dalmau i Ausàs | Sebastià Semene Guitart | Clara Pladevall | Gaël Aleix | Johan Espunyes | Roger Caritg | Manel Niel | Fèlix Amat | Nil Torres
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K. ii + 30pp. plus regional guidelines v.4.0
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Yes
Freshwater
Yes
Marine
No
Publication
INTUITIV (2023). Llista vermella de la fauna vertebrada d'Andorra - Validació de l'evaluació parcial 2023. Workshop Report. INTUITIV & Govern d'Andorra. 21pp.
Assessment ID
329841
Taxon name
Panthera pardus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Panthera pardus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
felidae
Genus
Panthera
Species
pardus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
According to genetic analyses, nine subspecies are recognized, with all continental African Leopards attributable to the nominate form, P. p. pardus (Miththapala et al. 1996, Uphyrkina et al. 2001).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
There are a number of records of Leopard in the mountains of the northern UAE and it is once likely to have occurred widely there. However, the species is assessed as Regionally Extinct because there have been no confirmed records since 1994 and there is no convincing evidence to show that the species still occurs in UAE. There is no rescue effect because there are believed to be no leopards left in Musandam or the northern Hajar Mountains of Oman.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There are a number of records of Leopard in the mountains of the northern UAE and it is once likely to have occurred widely there. Thesiger (1949) wrote that a Leopard visited Jebel Hafeet ...some years ago. There is a report of a Leopard shot in Masafi, east of Sharjah, in 1962 (Harrison 1968) and another report from Qalidda Pass (Harrison 1971). Hellyer (1993) said there had been nine reports in the previous 30 years. These included one wounded on Jebel Hafeet in 1976, which later died in Al Ain Zoo; a male shot in Ras al Khaimah in July 1986; a female and two young adults in the same Emirate in December 1986, and the capture of one Leopard near Masafi in February 1991. A leopard was shot in the upper part of Wadi Zibat, a tributary of Wadi Bih with permanent water, in November 1992 and its skull retrieved, and another was shot in the same locality in May 1993 (Hellyer 1993). A Leopard was killed in the Al Wa'eeb area of Musandam in 1994 and another was seen there in August 1994 (Hellyer 1994). Since then there have been a few reports of Leopard tracks in the mountains, including at Hatta, but none of these has been confirmed. Summaries of Leopard status in UAE are provided in Aspinall et al. (2005) and Edmonds et al. (2006). There is no convincing evidence to indicate that the species is still present in UAE. Reports from the Omani sector of the Musandam Peninsula continued through the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, including eight killed in 1980, but with no confirmed reports since 1997 it appears that the species no longer occurs in the Hajar Mountains of Oman (Spalton et al. 2006). Leopards are widely distributed across Africa and Asia, but they have been extirpated from large portions of their historic range (Stein et al. 2016). Populations across the Arabian Peninsula are at critically low levels (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
All UAE records are from mountains and wadis in the Hajar range.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Persecution (shooting, trapping and poisoning) as well as reduction in the prey base (due to hunting and competition with increasing numbers of livestock), development of wadis, limited access to water, and fragmentation are considered to be the main causes of the decline of the species in UAE (Edmonds et al. 2006). The reports in the 1990s coincided with abundant rainfall during that decade, which was not the case in the 2000s, and drought may have hastened the disappearance of the species from the UAE (G. Feulner, pers. comm. 2018).
History
There have been no confirmed records since 1994 and there is no convincing evidence to show that the species still occurs in UAE. Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Critically Endangered, perhaps on the assumption that some animals may persist. The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Critically Endangered (CR D).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR